Skip to main content

Security report for chatbot.com

Text, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Text, Inc. operates the ChatBot platform, offering AI-powered chatbot software designed to enhance customer support, marketing, and sales through automated, data-driven AI chatbots. The company positions itself as a leading provider in the AI chatbot market, serving thousands of businesses globally with a comprehensive suite of features including multichannel communication, AI-generated replies, and advanced AI training. The platform integrates with popular tools such as LiveChat, Shopify, Slack, and Facebook Messenger, enabling seamless customer engagement across multiple channels. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features, providing a professional user experience. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content, indicating an area for compliance improvement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts trustworthiness despite the professional presentation and strong branding. Overall, ChatBot.com presents a mature, well-branded SaaS offering with strong market presence and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security policy transparency, and domain registration clarity are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of chatbot.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chatbot.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention chatbot.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,976
Employees
0
Customers
5,946
Third parties
30
Weak passwords
16%

11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for chatbot.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ChatBot.com is positioned as a significant player in the AI chatbot SaaS market, targeting businesses seeking to automate customer service and sales engagement. The company leverages partnerships with related platforms (LiveChat, HelpDesk, KnowledgeBase) to expand its ecosystem and enhance product offerings. Its business model focuses on subscription-based software with free trials to attract new customers. The presence of extensive integrations and a partner program indicates a strategic approach to market penetration and customer retention. Customer testimonials and a large user base suggest strong product-market fit and growth potential. The company targets medium to large enterprises and diverse sectors requiring customer engagement automation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure programs are evident. The absence of WHOIS transparency is a notable gap, potentially impacting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, improvements in security policy publication, header implementation, and incident response readiness are advised to strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web-based attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or use verified WHOIS data to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Text, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Text, Inc.
Description
ChatBot® uses AI-generated responses to instantly help your customers. Get 24/7 support and ultra-high satisfaction rates. Test an AI chatbot for free.
Key services
AI-powered customer service, Instant AI chatbot setup, Multichannel communication, AI-generated replies, Advanced AI training, Visual chatbot builder, Integrations with platforms like LiveChat, Shopify, Slack
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot scripts, OpenWidget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with required email input
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML
  4. Multiple integrations and tracking scripts indicate mature marketing and analytics setup
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  6. Strong branding and social media presence linked
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No security headers detected in provided data, recommend adding for improved security posture
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with integrations of Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. The site is well-structured with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with multiple external scripts, which may impact load times. The technical stack supports scalability and integration flexibility but could benefit from optimization and enhanced security configurations. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low25 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +5Low25 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chatbot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chatbot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.