Skip to main content

Security report for chasing.com

CHASING · Technology · China

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CHASING operates as a technology company specializing in the design and sale of innovative underwater drones targeting both consumer and light-industrial markets. Their website presents a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging advanced JavaScript frameworks and multiple analytics and marketing tools to engage users globally. Despite the lack of WHOIS registration data, the site demonstrates a credible e-commerce platform with clear product offerings and a consistent brand image. The technical infrastructure is robust with HTTPS and content security policies in place, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is limited, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies detected, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the business appears legitimate but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chasing.com

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CHASING positions itself as a niche player in the underwater drone market, focusing on innovation and quality. Their business model centers on direct online sales of consumer and industrial-grade underwater ROVs equipped with cameras. The company targets technology enthusiasts, professionals in underwater exploration, and industrial users requiring underwater robotics. The website's integration of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of detailed company registration and contact information online limits full business credibility assessment. The company likely operates from China, as indicated by meta tags and language settings. Growth potential is supported by a clear product focus and global accessibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a Content Security Policy to upgrade insecure requests, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, the lack of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy and security considerations. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may expose the company to compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Enhance security headers by adding HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Consider registering WHOIS information publicly or using verified privacy protection services to improve domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CHASING
Description
Explore the unexplored with CHASING Underwater Drones. Start shopping for consumer-grade or light-industrial-grade underwater ROVs with cameras.
Key services
consumer-grade underwater drones, light-industrial-grade underwater ROVs with cameras
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 1.9.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Microsoft Clarity, Alibaba Apsara Media Player
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about underwater drones.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  6. Security headers are minimal but include CSP to upgrade insecure requests.
  7. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js framework with Element UI components, supported by jQuery and Alibaba's media player for video content. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and marketing. The site uses HTTPS with a Content Security Policy to enforce secure connections. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and language alternates. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chasing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chasing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.