The website exhibits significant security and compliance gaps, particularly in GDPR adherence and NIS2 regulatory requirements, which could expose the business to legal penalties and reputational damage. While email and network security are strong, missing critical security headers and poor privacy practices increase risk exposure. Immediate remediation is needed to protect sensitive data, ensure regulatory compliance, and improve overall trustworthiness.
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention charmed-kubeflow.io, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for charmed-kubeflow.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Technical notes
Notes
Critical issues include the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which exposes the site to cross-site scripting attacks, and missing fundamental GDPR components such as a Privacy Policy and Cookie Consent Banner, risking non-compliance penalties. NIS2-related deficiencies are prominent with no security framework, incident response, or business continuity plans documented, reflecting immature security governance. The DNS configuration has a high-risk unregistered MX record and lacks DNSSEC, increasing susceptibility to DNS attacks. SSL/TLS configuration needs attention with an expiring certificate and mixed content detected, potentially undermining secure connections.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Services and partners the site relies on, identified automatically from its content. Only domains with a clear business relationship are listed.
ubuntu.compartner · 95% confidenceUbuntu is a key partner providing the underlying OS and ecosystem support for Charmed Kubeflow59/100
microk8s.iopartner · 90% confidenceMicroK8s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution by Canonical, closely related to Charmed Kubeflow deployments68/100
charmhub.iopartner · 90% confidenceCharmhub is the platform for managing charms, integral to Charmed Kubeflow's deployment and lifecycle managementScanning
jaas.aipartner · 90% confidenceJuju as a Service (JaaS) is a critical service provider for deploying and managing charms in Charmed KubeflowScanning
maas.iopartner · 85% confidenceMAAS (Metal as a Service) is a Canonical product used for provisioning physical servers, relevant to Charmed Kubeflow infrastructure65/100
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with charmed-kubeflow.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review charmed-kubeflow.io.
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with charmed-kubeflow.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review charmed-kubeflow.io.