Skip to main content

Security report for channeltivity.com

Channeltivity · Technology · United States

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Channeltivity is a specialized SaaS provider offering partner relationship management (PRM) and channel management software targeted at technology companies and channel partner organizations. The company positions itself as a leader in the PRM industry, emphasizing ease of use and low total cost of ownership. Their platform includes modules for partner enablement, channel marketing, channel sales, integrations, and trust & safety features. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and rich in relevant content, targeting B2B technology audiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with AngularJS and uses modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Iubenda for cookie consent. Hosting is via WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN. However, a critical security gap exists as the site currently lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which severely impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-compliant policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the business appears legitimate and established with consistent WHOIS data and strong email authentication policies.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of channeltivity.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching channeltivity.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Channeltivity operates in the technology sector, focusing on channel management software for partner ecosystems. Their business model is SaaS-based, providing modular PRM solutions that cater to partner enablement, marketing, and sales automation. The company targets technology vendors and channel teams seeking to optimize partner productivity and collaboration. Their market position is strengthened by claims of low total cost of ownership and a user-friendly platform. The presence of customer logos and testimonials enhances credibility. The company maintains a clear digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting growth and customer engagement. No parent or subsidiary relationships were detected, indicating an independent small-sized enterprise founded around 2015.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security maturity with strong email authentication (DMARC with reject policy and SPF records) and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to data interception risks. The site does not implement HSTS, OCSP stapling, or session resumption, which are standard best practices for HTTPS security. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The security headers present are minimal and do not include advanced protections such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. These gaps should be addressed urgently to protect customer data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or 1.3 immediately to secure all site traffic.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Add comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with AngularJS 1.3.0 and jQuery 2.1.4, indicating a mix of modern and legacy technologies. Hosting is provided by WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN for performance and security. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin, and cookie consent is managed by Iubenda. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and lazy loading for images, improving user experience and performance. However, performance metrics were not available, and accessibility is basic. The lack of a valid SSL certificate is a major technical risk. Modernizing the tech stack by updating AngularJS and jQuery versions and improving accessibility would further enhance the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with channeltivity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review channeltivity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.