Skip to main content

Security report for chainpatrol.io

ChainPatrol · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ChainPatrol is a technology company specializing in AI-powered brand protection services tailored for Web3 companies. The website positions itself as a niche provider in the blockchain and Web3 security space, offering solutions to protect brands in this emerging market. The company appears to be US-based with a domain registered since 2017, indicating a stable presence in the industry. The website uses modern web technologies including Framer for CMS and design, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Twitter Ads. However, the site lacks critical compliance and security documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and terms of service, which are essential for trust and regulatory adherence. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosures reduce the overall security maturity. Contact information is not publicly available on the site, which may hinder user trust and engagement. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance credibility and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chainpatrol.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ChainPatrol operates in the technology sector focusing on AI-driven brand protection for Web3 companies, a growing niche market. Its business model likely revolves around providing SaaS or consulting services to blockchain projects and decentralized organizations. The company targets Web3 startups and established blockchain entities concerned with brand security and fraud prevention. The lack of visible contact details and compliance documentation suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise still maturing its digital presence. The domain age and registrar information support legitimacy, but the absence of certifications or trust signals on the website limits competitive advantage. Marketing efforts include Twitter Ads and Google Analytics, indicating active audience engagement strategies. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed, and the company appears to operate independently. Strategic growth could be supported by enhancing transparency, adding compliance documentation, and expanding contact channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited helps prevent unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement for DNS integrity. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. The site uses third-party tracking scripts, which may introduce privacy concerns if not properly managed. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were identified, the security posture would benefit from implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add clear contact information including company email addresses and phone numbers to improve trust and user engagement.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ChainPatrol
Description
AI-Powered Brand Protection for Web3 Companies
Key services
AI-powered brand protection, Web3 company security
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Twitter Ads, Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Twitter conversion tracking
Marketing tools
Twitter Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and is hosted behind Cloudflare
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage or metadata
  4. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Twitter Ads are present
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content
  8. Website content is focused on AI-powered brand protection for Web3 companies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and CMS platform, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. It integrates Google Analytics and Twitter Ads scripts for marketing and analytics purposes. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques, though mobile optimization is assessed as basic. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided data. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present, but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD for enhanced search engine understanding. Accessibility features are minimal, suggesting room for improvement to meet WCAG standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could be enhanced with better accessibility, SEO structured data, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chainpatrol.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chainpatrol.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.