Skip to main content

Security report for chainlabo.com

ChainLabo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ChainLabo is a specialized technology service provider offering streamlined staking solutions for Ethereum, Gnosis, and other blockchain assets. The company targets cryptocurrency holders and investors who seek non-custodial, risk-free staking services with simplified fiat pricing plans. Their market position is niche, focusing on blockchain staking with a professional and consistent web presence. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with integration of modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for bot protection, but lacks several important security headers which could improve its security posture. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional website presence suggests operational business. Overall, the website scores moderately well in content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility but should address privacy and security gaps to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chainlabo.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ChainLabo operates in the blockchain technology sector, providing staking and delegation services for multiple cryptocurrencies. Their business model is service-based, monetizing through fiat pricing plans for staking services without commission fees on some assets. The target customers are crypto investors lacking technical expertise or time to stake independently. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Notion for documentation and maintains an app portal for service access. Growth indicators include diversified staking options and competitive APYs. The company ecosystem includes client logos suggesting partnerships or endorsements. However, the lack of public contact information and missing WHOIS data may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities like XSS, clickjacking, and MIME sniffing. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security certifications are displayed. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, categorizing cookies and allowing user customization, indicating some privacy awareness. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. The missing WHOIS data raises legitimacy concerns and could be a red flag for phishing or domain hijacking risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements in headers, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish security contact information to enhance incident response readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ChainLabo
Description
ChainLabo offers a streamlined staking solution for Ethereum and Gnosis. Ideal solution for those who lack the time or technical expertise to set up staking independently.
Key services
Ethereum staking, Gnosis staking, Lido CSM staking, Eigenlayer restaking, SSV staking, Band staking, Near staking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, CookieYes cookie consent, reCAPTCHA, Webflow CMS
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent with customization options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or linked pages
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No data protection officer contact information found
  8. WHOIS data is missing, raising legitimacy questions
  9. Website content is professional and focused on blockchain staking services
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site uses reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and dynamic content, which may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business model, but there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy documentation to reduce technical risks and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chainlabo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chainlabo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.