Skip to main content

Security report for cgmodel.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.cgmodel.com appears to be a Chinese language platform focused on providing 3D modeling resources such as 3dmax, maya, and c4d models. However, the site content is currently inaccessible without passing a CAPTCHA verification challenge, indicating the presence of a security or anti-bot mechanism. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy or registration status. Technically, the site uses older jQuery and Geetest CAPTCHA for bot protection but lacks visible modern security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and no contact or business information is available, limiting trust and transparency. Overall, the site shows basic technical implementation but is hindered by accessibility and security concerns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cgmodel.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cgmodel.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,256
Employees
0
Customers
5,211
Third parties
45
Weak passwords
12%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cgmodel.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CG模型网 targets 3D artists and designers seeking downloadable 3D models. The business model likely revolves around providing or selling 3D assets. The absence of business registration details, contact information, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The platform uses CAPTCHA to protect against automated abuse, suggesting some operational maturity. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS data may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs Geetest CAPTCHA as a security control to mitigate automated access, which is a positive security measure. However, the CAPTCHA system shows network failure errors, indicating potential reliability issues. No HTTPS or security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a significant security gap. The absence of privacy policies and contact information for incident response further weakens the security posture. The domain's missing WHOIS data adds to legitimacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is low with critical improvements needed in transport security, header implementation, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Stabilize and monitor the CAPTCHA system to prevent network failures and ensure smooth user verification.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a security verification challenge with CAPTCHA and message indicating '页面访问异常' (Page access abnormal). Content is blocked pending verification. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Website focused on 3D models including 3dmax, maya, c4d models and high-quality 3D model materials for download.
Key services
3D model downloads, 3dmax models, maya models, c4d models, 3D model resources
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Geetest Captcha v4, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Geetest CAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a CAPTCHA verification page.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available for domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  4. No contact information or business certifications visible.
  5. Use of Geetest CAPTCHA indicates some security measures but with errors visible.
  6. Website is primarily in Chinese language targeting 3D modeling users.
  7. External links mostly to static assets and CAPTCHA provider domains.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond CAPTCHA.
  9. No social media or email contacts found.
  10. Website lacks SEO and accessibility optimizations.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates Geetest CAPTCHA v4 for bot protection. The HTML and CSS are basic with inline styles and no advanced frameworks detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. Performance is moderate but limited by the CAPTCHA challenge blocking content access. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic with no ARIA or semantic enhancements visible. SEO is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond title and no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site relies heavily on static assets hosted on its own domain and Geetest's CDN. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and minimal modern web practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cgmodel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cgmodel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.