Skip to main content

Security report for ceweb.br

Centro de Estudos sobre Tecnologias Web (Ceweb.br) · Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceweb.br is a Brazilian non-profit governmental department under NIC.br focused on advancing web technologies, accessibility, open data, and public policy formulation. It serves the Brazilian internet community, developers, designers, and policymakers by providing research, educational courses, and community engagement. The website reflects a mature digital presence with good content quality, clear navigation, and a consistent brand aligned with its parent organization NIC.br and partner CGI.br. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Owl Carousel, with analytics powered by Piwik (Matomo) and marketing via MailChimp. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a moderate performance profile. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are not publicly visible. The security evaluation shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, no terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the organization's claims. Overall, Ceweb.br presents a trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained web presence suitable for its governmental and non-profit role, with recommendations to enhance security headers and incident response transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ceweb.br. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceweb.br

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ceweb.br holds a strong position in Brazil's internet governance ecosystem as a department of NIC.br, collaborating closely with CGI.br and other national internet organizations. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative role in web technology research, accessibility standards development (notably the ABNT NBR 17225 standard), and open data initiatives. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on community service, education, and policy support. Revenue streams are likely government or institutional funding. Target customers include Brazilian internet stakeholders, developers, and public institutions. Growth indicators include ongoing projects, courses, and active social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple Brazilian internet governance bodies and international standards organizations like W3C. Strategic observations highlight the organization's role as a trusted knowledge hub and policy influencer in Brazil's digital landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of secure external scripts and analytics tools is appropriate. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers for security incidents limits direct communication channels. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers, publishing incident response policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or other anti-bot mechanisms beyond MailChimp validation to reduce spam and abuse.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations such as GDPR and LGPD.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centro de Estudos sobre Tecnologias Web (Ceweb.br)
Description
Centro de Estudos sobre Tecnologias Web. Departamento do NIC.br que viabiliza a participação da comunidade brasileira no desenvolvimento global da Web e subsidia a formulação de políticas públicas.
Key services
Research and studies on web technologies, Promotion of open web standards, Accessibility initiatives, Open data projects, Educational courses and events, Policy formulation support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, MailChimp (newsletter), Piwik (Matomo) analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure external scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik (Matomo)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik (Matomo)
Marketing tools
MailChimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong affiliation with NIC.br and CGI.br enhances trust
  3. Good use of open web standards and accessibility focus
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid technical foundation using HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap framework, and JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. FontAwesome is used for iconography. The site integrates MailChimp for newsletter subscription and Piwik (Matomo) for analytics, indicating a focus on user engagement and data-driven insights. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social media sharing. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. There is no evidence of a CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Technical risks are minimal but could include outdated libraries if not regularly updated. Opportunities exist to modernize analytics and marketing tools and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceweb.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceweb.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.