Skip to main content

Security report for centropicasso.lv

Centro Picasso · Education · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centro Picasso is a small Latvian language school specializing in Spanish language education and cultural activities. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear course offerings targeting individuals interested in learning Spanish, including children and business professionals. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common plugins such as WPBakery, LayerSlider, and Slider Revolution, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centropicasso.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education sector focusing on language learning, particularly Spanish and related languages. It targets a niche market in Latvia with offerings including group and private lessons, online courses, and cultural events. The business model is service-based, relying on course registrations and events. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The website lacks detailed business registration or certification information, which could improve credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential exists through expanded online offerings and improved compliance.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found, indicating limited security maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, posing legal risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to protect user data and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centro Picasso
Description
Centro Picasso is an educational institution focused on teaching Spanish language and related cultural activities. They offer group and private lessons, summer courses, business Spanish, Catalan language classes, and cultural events.
Key services
Spanish language courses, Group lessons, Private lessons, Online group lessons, Summer intensive courses, Business Spanish, Catalan language classes, Cultural events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based language school site focused on Spanish courses.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact email is provided in header: riga@centropicasso.com.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is evident.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. Footer contains unrelated university links, possibly template remnants.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, LayerSlider, and Slider Revolution, indicating a standard but somewhat dated technology stack. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts, and integrates Google Maps API. The site is mobile responsive and has moderate performance. However, no advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected, and accessibility features are basic. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. There is some technical debt in the form of missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance features. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centropicasso.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centropicasso.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.