Skip to main content

Security report for cecdc.com

北京盘石信用管理有限公司 · Technology · China

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.cecdc.com represents Zhejiang Panshi Information Technology Co., Ltd., operating under Beijing Panshi Credit Management Co., Ltd. It serves as an authoritative third-party internet credit certification platform in China, providing services such as website security certification, credit brand rankings, and exposure of dishonest behaviors. The platform targets enterprises and internet users seeking trustworthy online business verification and credit information. The site demonstrates a solid market position with partnerships involving well-known Chinese companies and government-related entities. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery and analytics tools like GrowingIO and Baidu Analytics. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear professional and consistent. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement visible security headers or disclose incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators and cookie consent mechanisms, which could be a compliance risk for international users. Overall, the website is a credible business platform with good content quality and trust indicators but requires improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cecdc.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on internet credit certification and related services. It holds a medium-sized market presence with a business model centered on third-party verification and credit data aggregation. The platform benefits from partnerships with major Chinese enterprises and government bodies, enhancing its credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, data services, and consulting. The target customers are businesses seeking credit certification and consumers requiring trustworthy online information. Growth indicators include active content updates, multiple service offerings, and integration with blockchain research. The company maintains a professional online presence but should address domain registration transparency to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, posing risks under GDPR and other regulations. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for legitimacy and trust. Overall, while no immediate vulnerabilities are evident, the site should enhance its security controls and compliance documentation to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure WHOIS data transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Develop and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security readiness and transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
北京盘石信用管理有限公司
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
北京盘石信用管理有限公司
Description
浙江盘石信息技术股份有限公司 互联网信用认证平台。互联网信用认证平台隶属于北京盘石信用管理有限公司，是负责运行管理网站身份信息验证的权威第三方服务机构；是网站的“诚信身份证”，也是网民判别网站是否诚信的权威认证标识。
Key services
互联网信用认证, 网站安全认证, 信用查询, 信用品牌排名, 信用研究院, 区块链产业研究, 曝光台服务
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, GrowingIO Analytics, Baidu Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
GrowingIO, Baidu Analytics, 51.la
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
GrowingIO, Baidu Analytics, 51.la
Marketing tools
GrowingIO Analytics, Baidu Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or domain unregistered publicly
  4. Multiple trusted business partners and certifications displayed
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  6. Moderate use of analytics and tracking scripts
  7. Contact information clearly provided with company email and phone
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Website content is primarily in Chinese
  10. No forms detected that collect user data on main page
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack with jQuery and several analytics scripts. The HTML structure is valid and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and keywords. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site uses external analytics and tracking services, which should be managed carefully for privacy compliance. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to modernize the stack and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cecdc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cecdc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.