Skip to main content

Security report for catedoc.ch

La Doc - Librairie et médiathèque · Education · Switzerland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

La Doc - Librairie et médiathèque is a small, local library and bookstore service based in Fribourg, Switzerland, specializing in religious and liturgical materials. The website provides access to thematic collections aligned with liturgical seasons and offers user account management for borrowing and searching resources. The business appears community-focused with a clear target audience interested in religious education and media. Technically, the site uses a modern web stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Fonts, running on the NetBiblio WebOPAC platform. While the site is functional and well-structured, mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and anti-CSRF protections. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the site content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the site is suitable for its educational purpose but requires improvements in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching catedoc.ch

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education and non-profit sectors, serving a niche market of religious and liturgical resource users. Its business model centers on library lending and media access, supported by a local presence in Fribourg. The website's partnership with Swissbib and use of Alcoda GmbH's NetBiblio platform indicate integration with established library networks. The presence of a Facebook page suggests community engagement. Revenue streams are likely limited or grant-based given the non-profit nature. Growth indicators are not evident from the site. The partnership ecosystem includes Swissbib and Alcoda GmbH, enhancing resource availability and platform stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and session timeout monitoring is implemented. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks. The login form lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens, increasing vulnerability to cross-site request forgery attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires significant enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms, especially login and account management forms.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Conduct a security audit of third-party libraries and update them regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
La Doc - Librairie et médiathèque
Description
A library and bookstore service providing access to religious and liturgical resources, including thematic collections for liturgical seasons.
Key services
Book lending, Media access, Thematic liturgical resource collections, User account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (LESS compiled), JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Twitter Typeahead, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap, jQuery
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Login form with password field
  • Session timeout monitoring script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a library and bookstore service for religious and liturgical materials.
  2. Content is in English with options for French and German.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  4. Contact info is clearly provided including email and phone.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security features.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Site uses modern web fonts and Bootstrap framework.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the NetBiblio WebOPAC platform version 4.0.0.502, utilizing Bootstrap and jQuery for responsive design and interactivity. Google Fonts are used for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as fonts.googleapis.com and oss.maxcdn.com. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility features are basic, including skip links and form labels, but could be improved. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with catedoc.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review catedoc.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.