Skip to main content

Security report for catapultlabs.eu

Catapult Labs · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Catapult Labs is a specialized software development and systems integration company based in Estonia, focusing on critical infrastructure and systems integrators globally. The company offers end-to-end software development, consulting, and integration services, with a strong portfolio including clients such as Ericsson, Pipedrive, and Fujitsu. They also act as an official reseller for Microsoft and Adobe business software licenses. Technically, the company employs a modern technology stack including Node.js, Java, React, Flutter, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and modern tracking tools but lacks explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the business appears credible and professional with a strong market position in its niche, though it should enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching catapultlabs.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Catapult Labs operates in the technology sector with a focus on energy, telecommunications, logistics, and financial services. Its business model centers on software development, system integration, and consulting, supported by strategic partnerships and a reputable client base. The company targets owners of critical infrastructure and systems integrators, leveraging its expertise to deliver tailored solutions. The presence of official reseller partnerships and a diverse client portfolio indicates a stable revenue stream and growth potential. The company maintains a small to medium size with consistent branding and professional content, positioning itself as a trusted niche player in the European market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable analytics and marketing tools loaded asynchronously. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response information highlight gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also presents compliance risks under GDPR. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes, and publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance its security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including a security.txt file, to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Catapult Labs OÜ
VAT number
EE101794545
Registration number
12853765
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Catapult Labs
Description
A collaborative software development and systems integration lab that specializes in working with owners of critical infrastructure and systems integrators across the world.
Key services
Custom software design and development, Systems and component integrations, Data migration, Technological transition from legacy systems, Microsoft and Adobe business software licenses reseller
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Node.js, Java, Elixir, React, Angular, Flutter, React Native, AWS, Azure, Docker, Kubernetes, NGINX
Frameworks
Spring, Play Framework, Redux, TypeScript
Platforms
Web, Mobile (Hybrid and Native)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with asynchronous loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy
  4. Strong client references and portfolio indicate business credibility
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  8. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with a modern front-end stack including React and Angular logos displayed, indicating familiarity with these frameworks. Backend technologies mentioned include Node.js, Java, and Elixir, with infrastructure hosted on AWS and Azure. The site loads multiple asynchronous analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, which may impact privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The technical setup supports scalability and integration capabilities but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with catapultlabs.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review catapultlabs.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.