Skip to main content

Security report for catalog3d.com

Catalog3D · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Catalog3D is a technology platform focused on the creation, consumption, and sale of 3D models and materials, primarily targeting users of Promob software and 3D content creators. The platform offers subscription-based access to libraries of 3D models and materials, including those created by partner users and brands. The website is built on a Microsoft IIS server using ASP.NET MVC and AngularJS, with Babylon.js for 3D rendering. DNS hosting is managed via Microsoft Azure DNS. Despite a modern tech stack, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security concern. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages are found in the accessible content. No explicit contact information or security policies are provided, limiting transparency and trust. The website content is primarily in Portuguese and includes partner brand logos, indicating some level of business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching catalog3d.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Catalog3D occupies a niche market in the 3D modeling and materials platform sector, leveraging partnerships with Promob and other brands to offer a collaborative content ecosystem. Its business model revolves around user-generated content and subscription access to curated libraries. The platform targets professional and hobbyist 3D modelers, as well as brands seeking to showcase their product catalogs digitally. The presence of partner brands suggests a growing partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of visible privacy, security, and contact information may hinder user trust and limit growth potential. The technical infrastructure is moderately modern but requires improvements in security and compliance to support scalability and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS and Content-Security-Policy are present, they are ineffective without HTTPS. The DNS configuration includes a valid SPF record but lacks DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records, reducing email and DNS security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, indicating immature security governance. Cookie consent is implemented, but privacy compliance is incomplete without a privacy policy. Overall, the site is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks and lacks transparency in security practices, posing risks to user data and business reputation.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA DNS records to enhance domain and email security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  6. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
  8. Enhance analytics transparency and data retention policies to align with privacy regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on Microsoft IIS 10.0 with ASP.NET MVC 4.0 and AngularJS, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technology stack. Babylon.js is used for 3D rendering, which is appropriate for the platform's core functionality. DNS is hosted on Azure DNS with multiple authoritative name servers, ensuring reliable resolution. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols severely impact security and user trust. Performance metrics are missing or zero, suggesting no performance data was captured or the site is slow to respond. The site includes multiple JavaScript libraries and frameworks, including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Owl Carousel, which are standard but may require updates. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but requires modernization and security hardening to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with catalog3d.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review catalog3d.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.