Skip to main content

Security report for cartflows.com

CartFlows · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CartFlows is a mature and well-established WordPress sales funnel builder platform, founded in 2018, with a strong market position and a large user base exceeding 223,000 users. The company offers a comprehensive suite of funnel-building tools including one-click upsells, order bumps, A/B split testing, and conversion-optimized templates, targeting WooCommerce store owners, online course creators, agencies, and consultancies. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and clear navigation, optimized for mobile and SEO. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. Security posture is basic with HSTS enabled but no valid TLS protocols or OCSP stapling, and malformed CAA records. Privacy compliance is partially met with a clear privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Business credibility is strong with testimonials and trust signals, but contact information is limited to forms without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to ensure trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cartflows.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CartFlows operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, providing SaaS-style WordPress plugins to enhance sales funnel conversions. Its business model relies on premium plugin sales and add-ons, supported by a large community and frequent feature updates. The company targets a broad audience including e-commerce merchants, course creators, agencies, and event organizers, emphasizing ease of use and integration with popular platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes related service domains for customer accounts and translations. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, leveraging social media and affiliate marketing. Growth indicators include a mature domain, extensive feature set, and active user testimonials. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving security and privacy transparency to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of CartFlows' website is basic with significant gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose users to potential interception and trust issues. While HSTS is enabled, lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces security effectiveness. DNS CAA records are malformed, which could affect certificate issuance controls. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The site uses SPF records correctly for email protection. No known vulnerabilities or malware are detected, but the invalid SSL is a critical issue impacting business risk. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture requires immediate remediation of SSL and TLS issues and enhanced policy disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix and renew the SSL certificate to enable valid HTTPS and modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3).
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  3. Correct DNS CAA records to valid syntax to control certificate authorities.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and privacy regulations.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with Elementor and integrates multiple third-party plugins and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and ConvertBox. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing robust DNS services but SSL configuration is currently broken or missing. The site has a large number of resources (488) and a large page size (~1.55 MB), resulting in slow load times (~20.75 seconds), indicating potential technical debt or optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and semantic HTML. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include performance bottlenecks and critical SSL issues that could impact user trust and search rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cartflows.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cartflows.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.