Skip to main content

Security report for carrier.lv

anaZana Inc. · Technology · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

anaZana Inc. operates a platform focused on enabling users to create e-stores and websites, targeting individuals and businesses seeking to establish an online presence. The company claims to have facilitated the creation of over 10,000 websites, positioning itself as a technology provider in the website creation market. The website content is currently disabled for public use, serving as a placeholder with marketing information about their services. Technically, the website employs legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.8.1 and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. Analytics and advertising scripts from Google and Alexa are present, indicating some level of digital marketing activity. However, the site lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and the content is minimal with basic mobile and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with missing privacy and cookie policies, represents significant compliance and security gaps. The WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and user trust. Overall, the website exhibits a low security posture and limited business credibility due to missing critical information and outdated technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security, compliance, and transparency are necessary to enhance trust and operational maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Redis

      Port 6379 (Redis) is publicly accessible - Redis - In-memory database

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Redis using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MongoDB

      Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MongoDB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching carrier.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

anaZana targets the website and e-commerce creation market, offering a platform and specialist services to build online stores and websites. The company appears to focus on small to medium-sized businesses or individual entrepreneurs. The business model is primarily platform-based with potential revenue from subscriptions or development services. Market positioning is modest with a claim of over 10,000 websites created, indicating some traction. However, the lack of detailed business information, contact data, and verified domain registration limits confidence in operational scale and legitimacy. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low, with critical issues including lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The missing WHOIS registration data further undermines trust. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection frameworks, nor any incident response readiness or security culture indicators. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may expose the site to vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is inadequate for a business-facing platform, exposing users and the company to potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  4. Update technical stack to modern versions and add security headers to enhance protection.
  5. Verify and update domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
anaZana Inc.
Description
anaZana offers a platform for creating e-stores and websites, allowing users to build their own online shops or websites or get assistance from specialists.
Key services
Website creation, E-store creation, Specialist development services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.1, Google Analytics, Alexa Certify, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Alexa Certify
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Alexa Certify
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently disabled for public use with a placeholder message.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers present.
  4. No security policies or incident response contacts available.
  5. Website uses outdated jQuery version (1.8.1).
  6. No HTTPS or security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Advertising and analytics scripts from Google and Alexa are present.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly marketing-oriented for website creation services.
  9. No forms or data collection fields detected on the page.
  10. No social media links or company contact details found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery 1.8.1 and relies on Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. Analytics and advertising scripts from Google and Alexa are integrated. The HTML structure is basic with minimal content and no forms or interactive elements. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced SEO or structured data detected. The absence of HTTPS and security headers indicates technical debt and security risks. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern technologies and optimization. The site currently serves a placeholder page indicating it is disabled for public use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with carrier.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review carrier.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.