Skip to main content

Security report for captcha4wp.com

Captcha4WP · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Captcha4WP is a specialized WordPress plugin provider focused on delivering anti-spam CAPTCHA solutions for WordPress websites and e-commerce stores. The company offers integration with multiple CAPTCHA providers including Google reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha, and Cloudflare Turnstile, targeting WordPress site owners and administrators seeking to reduce spam and fake registrations. The business has a solid market presence with over 100,000 active installs and has been acquired by WPKube, indicating growth and strategic backing. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content relevance, supporting a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching captcha4wp.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention captcha4wp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for captcha4wp.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the technology sector, specifically within WordPress plugin development and e-commerce security. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive compatibility with popular WordPress plugins and ease of use without coding skills. Revenue streams likely include plugin sales and premium support. The target customer segment includes WordPress site owners, WooCommerce store managers, and administrators concerned with spam prevention. The acquisition by WPKube suggests a growing partnership ecosystem and potential for expanded market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a formal security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy disclosure and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to align with privacy regulations and enhance user transparency.
  5. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Captcha4WP
Description
Best Antispam & reCaptcha Solution for WordPress
Key services
CAPTCHA integration for WordPress forms, Support for multiple CAPTCHA providers (Google reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha, Cloudflare Turnstile), WooCommerce CAPTCHA support, Geo-blocking for spam control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, WooCommerce
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Freemius
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based plugin site focused on CAPTCHA anti-spam solutions.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and professional design.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via support ticket form.
  4. No explicit cookie policy or consent mechanism detected.
  5. Security headers are not explicitly visible; SSL is properly configured.
  6. No evidence of tracking or analytics services detected in the HTML.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter accounts linked to parent company WPKube.
  8. The site uses modern WordPress plugins and themes with Yoast SEO for optimization.
  9. The site was acquired by WPKube, indicating some level of business maturity and backing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, with jQuery and JavaScript libraries for frontend functionality. The hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). There is no evidence of heavy tracking or analytics scripts, which supports privacy. The site uses Freemius for plugin sales and checkout processing. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and cookie management would modernize the security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with captcha4wp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review captcha4wp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.