Skip to main content

Security report for captag.events

SCAN-MATCH · Technology · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Captag, operated by SCAN-MATCH, is a French event technology company founded in 2012, providing a comprehensive platform for managing physical, hybrid, and digital events. Their services include event registration, RFID parcours, interactive questionnaires, live voting, web applications, VIP management, gamification, and more. The company targets B2B, B2C, VIP, associative, and retail sectors, boasting a strong client portfolio including Orange, Air France, Roland Garros, and Google. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Leaflet, hosted on Google Cloud Platform, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is strong, supported by ISO 27001 and ISO 20121 certifications, HTTPS enforcement, and a robust cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, and privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and a dedicated DPO contact. Overall, Captag presents a professional, trustworthy, and mature digital presence aligned with its business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching captag.events

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Captag holds a solid market position as a specialized event technology provider with over a decade of experience. Their business model revolves around customizable, phygital event solutions that integrate technology and human presence. The company leverages partnerships with major brands and agencies, enhancing credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, event service packages, and custom development. The target customer segments span corporate clients, agencies, and event organizers seeking innovative engagement tools. The presence of certifications and a dedicated DPO reflects a mature compliance posture. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, including major French and international brands, indicating strong industry integration and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and ISO 27001 certification indicating robust information security management. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics CMP, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy are areas for improvement. Incident response contact details are not explicitly provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability management processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information on the website to enhance security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SCAN-MATCH
VAT number
FR 44 532858388
Registration number
532 858 388
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SCAN-MATCH
Description
Solution complète pour événements professionnels : gestion des invités, check-in rapide, web app, networking, badges connectés et expérience personnalisée.
Key services
Event registration platform, RFID connected parcours, Satisfaction questionnaires, Live quizzes and voting, Web applications, VIP management, Event management software, Gamification, Badge printing, Connected cloakroom
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3, jQuery 3.7, Font Awesome 6.5, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Swiper, Leaflet.js, Isotope layout, Cloudinary, Matomo analytics, Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager (conditional on consent), LibPhoneNumber, Intl-tel-input
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Google Cloud Platform (hosting)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • ISO 27001 certified
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong presence of business and legal information including DPO contact and certifications.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Usercentrics CMP.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Good SEO and social media integration.
  6. Notable client logos and partnerships displayed enhancing trust.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. SSL/TLS is properly configured and enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Leaflet for interactive maps. Hosting on Google Cloud Platform ensures reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The use of Matomo and Google Tag Manager (conditional on consent) reflects a balanced approach to analytics and privacy. The site employs advanced UI features like isotope filtering and animation on scroll, indicating technical maturity. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with captag.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review captag.events.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.