Skip to main content

Security report for capptain.be

Capptain bv · Technology · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Capptain bv is a Belgian digital solutions partner specializing in accelerating business growth through process automation and custom digital solutions. Founded in 2014 as Fluvio, the company has evolved into a full-service digital agency offering web, app, and software development services. Their market position is that of a trusted technology partner for businesses seeking modern and professional digital transformation. The website demonstrates a strong focus on client engagement, showcasing case studies and leveraging modern technologies such as Laravel, Vue JS, and PHP. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, the business credibility is high, supported by transparent contact information, legal disclosures, and active social media channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capptain.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Capptain operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses that require digital transformation and automation solutions. Their business model is service-oriented, providing tailored software development, web presence enhancement, and SaaS solutions. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with technologies like SmartRecruiters and BrightStaffing, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include project-based development, SaaS subscriptions, and consulting services. The presence of EU and regional funding logos suggests engagement with public funding programs, enhancing credibility and growth potential. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and professional online presence, positioning itself as a reliable partner in the Belgian market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The use of modern JavaScript modules and frameworks reduces common vulnerabilities. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly implemented, representing an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are introduced.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights explicitly on the website.
  5. Maintain active monitoring and update of SSL/TLS configurations to uphold excellent encryption standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Capptain bv
VAT number
BE0563.352.739
Registration number
0563.352.739
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Capptain bv
Description
Sneller groeien, processen automatiseren of jouw bedrijf op de kaart zetten?
Key services
Development, Web, Software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Vue JS, Laravel, PHP, Livewire, BrightStaffing, SmartRecruiters
Frameworks
Laravel, Vue JS, Livewire
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Calendly widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional digital agency focused on custom software and web development
  3. Strong branding and consistent design language
  4. Good presence of contact information and legal disclosures
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. No visible security or privacy red flags
  7. Active social media presence on major platforms
  8. Use of Calendly for scheduling free advisory sessions
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern tech stack including Laravel (PHP framework), Vue JS for frontend interactivity, and Livewire for dynamic components. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons, and integrates Calendly for scheduling. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and performance, with preloading of CSS and JavaScript modules. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is used as the main platform, but WordPress is referenced in case studies, indicating client projects. The technical implementation is robust with good use of modern web standards and frameworks, supporting scalability and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capptain.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capptain.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.