Skip to main content

Security report for capgemini-consulting.com

Capgemini · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Capgemini Invent is a prominent management consultancy brand under the Capgemini group, specializing in innovative consulting services that combine strategy, technology, data science, and design to help businesses transform and grow. The website reflects a mature, enterprise-level digital presence with comprehensive content, strong branding, and a wide range of services targeting C-level executives and large enterprises. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like React and Bootstrap, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. However, a critical security issue is the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which undermines the site's security posture despite the presence of several security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, showing good compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires immediate attention to SSL configuration to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capgemini-consulting.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leader in management consulting with a focus on digital transformation, innovation, and sustainability across multiple industries including technology, manufacturing, energy, finance, retail, telecommunications, and healthcare. It operates at an enterprise scale with a global footprint and a strong brand ecosystem including subsidiaries and partners like frog, Cambridge Consultants, Purpose, and Synapse. The business model revolves around providing consulting and technology services that enable clients to navigate disruption and achieve sustainable growth. The website's rich content, client stories, and research insights demonstrate a mature marketing and thought leadership strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled lead generation approach via forms and contact pages.

Security posture

The website employs several security best practices such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS headers. It is free from known SSL/TLS vulnerabilities like Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, and Logjam. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security flaw. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or dedicated security contact channels. The site lacks DNSSEC, which could enhance DNS security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but significantly impacted by the SSL issue, which should be prioritized for remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and correctly install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data in transit.
  2. Enable and enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives where possible.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider implementing DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using React and Bootstrap frameworks, ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. It integrates multiple third-party services including Pardot for marketing automation, Parsely for content analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site uses advanced SEO tools like Yoast SEO Premium and includes structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance metrics are not provided but the presence of many scripts and large images suggests potential for optimization. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are good, with proper meta tags, alt attributes, and ARIA labels. The technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capgemini-consulting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capgemini-consulting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.