Skip to main content

Security report for capgemini.com

Capgemini · Technology · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

60/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Capgemini is a global leader in consulting, technology services, and digital transformation, offering a broad portfolio of integrated services that combine technology expertise with deep sector knowledge. The company operates at an enterprise scale with a strong market position and multiple subsidiaries including Capgemini Engineering, Capgemini Invent, Frog Design, and Sogeti. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear branding, and a focus on innovation and sustainability. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and Bootstrap, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Pardot and Parsely. However, the security posture is weak due to an invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which poses a significant risk to user trust and data security. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, indicating good compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent remediation of SSL and TLS issues to improve security and user confidence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of capgemini.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capgemini.com

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention capgemini.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
48,459
Employees
3,379
Customers
32,804
Third parties
12,276
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-06-18 · 530 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for capgemini.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.capgemini.com2026-06-18
  • –sts.capgemini.com2026-06-17
  • –sts.capgemini.com2026-06-17
  • –sts.capgemini.com2026-06-17
  • –sts.capgemini.com2026-06-17

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Capgemini's market positioning as a global consulting and technology services leader is supported by its extensive service offerings in cloud, AI, cybersecurity, and sustainability. The business model focuses on partnering with enterprises to drive digital transformation and innovation. The company targets large enterprises and government sectors worldwide, with a strong presence in Europe and the Americas. The website's content and structure emphasize thought leadership, client success stories, and industry expertise, reinforcing its competitive advantage. The partnership ecosystem includes technology alliances and investor relations, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include active news, insights, and career sections, signaling ongoing expansion and talent acquisition.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to critical issues such as an invalid SSL certificate and no enabled TLS protocols, which undermine secure communications. While security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are present, the CSP includes unsafe directives that could be tightened. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further weakens security. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is good with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of direct security contact channels and certifications suggests limited public security governance disclosures. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and enhancement of security policies are recommended to mitigate business risks.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate and enable TLS 1.2 or higher to secure all communications.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to remove unsafe-eval and unsafe-inline directives.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  5. Enhance transparency by listing security certifications and appointing a Data Protection Officer publicly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with React and Bootstrap frameworks, supporting a responsive and content-rich user experience. Integration with marketing and analytics tools like Pardot, Parsely, and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, suggesting potential issues with load time measurement or optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS records point to NSOne and IP 192.0.66.152. Technical debt is indicated by disabled TLS protocols and invalid SSL, which pose operational risks. Modernization efforts should focus on security hardening and performance optimization to support business continuity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 87/100Low16 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium15 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capgemini.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capgemini.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.