Skip to main content

Security report for candyai.gg

EverAI Limited · Technology · Malta

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Candy AI is a specialized AI companion platform offering personalized virtual characters with chat, voice, image, and video interaction capabilities. The company, EverAI Limited, operates from Malta and has established a mature online presence since 2017. The platform targets users seeking companionship, emotional support, creative storytelling, and AI exploration, leveraging a freemium subscription model with token-based purchases. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, PWA features, and integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools such as Mixpanel and New Relic. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA v3 integration, and encrypted transactions, although formal security policies and incident response disclosures are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates good design, usability, and compliance with GDPR, supported by clear contact channels and privacy protections.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching candyai.gg

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Candy AI occupies a niche market in AI-driven virtual companionship, differentiating itself with multimedia interaction and extensive customization options. The business model combines free access with premium subscriptions and token purchases, appealing to a broad audience including casual users and AI enthusiasts. The company maintains active social media engagement and uses third-party services for customer support and affiliate marketing. The domain's age and privacy-protected WHOIS registration align with legitimate operational practices. Growth potential is supported by continuous content updates and multilingual support.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS, bot protection via reCAPTCHA, and encrypted user transactions. Security headers are partially implemented, and event listeners for CSP violations indicate awareness of security best practices. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Recommendations include publishing formal security documentation and enhancing header configurations to strengthen defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add missing security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Conduct regular third-party library vulnerability assessments and updates.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EverAI Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EverAI Limited
Description
Candy AI is an immersive AI Companion platform that lets you interact with lifelike virtual characters through chat, voice, images, and videos. With over 100 male and female companions to choose from, users can register for free and explore affordable subscription options.
Key services
AI chat companions, AI voice interaction, Image and video generation, Custom AI character creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, jQuery, New Relic monitoring, Mixpanel analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Stimulus Reflex, Turbo Frames
Platforms
Web, PWA (Progressive Web App)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Encrypted transactions
  • Client-side input validation
  • Use of security event listeners (CSP violation detection)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Google Analytics (implied via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. Strong focus on AI companionship with personalized characters.
  3. Multiple language support with language selection modals.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring.
  5. Privacy and GDPR compliance clearly indicated.
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  7. Contact and support channels are well provided.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Alpine.js, Stimulus Reflex, Turbo Frames, and integrates analytics and monitoring tools like Mixpanel and New Relic. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with PWA capabilities and uses reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The CMS is custom or not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and interactive user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with candyai.gg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review candyai.gg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.