Skip to main content

Security report for campana-schott.com

Campana & Schott · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Campana & Schott is a large international management and technology consulting firm headquartered in Germany, with over 600 employees across Europe and the USA. The company specializes in digital transformation, project and change management, Microsoft technologies, and IT strategy consulting. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive service descriptions targeting business clients undergoing significant organizational and technological changes. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, uses modern web technologies, and integrates consent management via Usercentrics, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly, reducing trust slightly, but the overall professional presentation and market position support legitimacy. No adult or questionable content is present, and the site is fully accessible without WAF blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campana-schott.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
70
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention campana-schott.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for campana-schott.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position serving large enterprises including many DAX-listed companies, indicating a high level of trust and expertise. Their business model focuses on consulting services in technology and management, with a particular emphasis on Microsoft platforms and digital transformation. The website highlights a broad sector coverage including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and government. The presence of multiple social media channels and a dedicated career platform partner domain suggests active engagement and growth orientation. The lack of explicit business registration or VAT information on the site is typical for consulting firms but could be enhanced for transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to strengthen security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which is common but represents an opportunity for improvement. The missing WHOIS data is a concern from a trust perspective but does not directly indicate a security risk. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve defense in depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Investigate and clarify WHOIS data availability to resolve inconsistencies and improve domain trustworthiness.
  4. Maintain and regularly audit privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Campana & Schott
Description
Campana & Schott is an international management and technology consultancy with more than 600 employees in Europe and the U.S. They support clients in significant changes and transformation projects for lasting success.
Key services
Project and transformation management, Change Management, Microsoft Technologies consulting, IT Strategy & IT Organization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Usercentrics (consent management), Google Tag Manager, Video HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional consulting firm website with comprehensive service offerings.
  2. Strong focus on Microsoft technologies and digital transformation.
  3. Good implementation of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly named, but privacy policy likely included in About Us or footer.
  5. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and mature content management system suitable for enterprise use. It uses modern web standards including HTML5 video, CSS3, and JavaScript with asynchronous loading of analytics and consent scripts. The integration of Usercentrics for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics indicates a modern approach to privacy and data collection. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and mobile optimization is good. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and possibly enhance SEO metadata further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 35/100High25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campana-schott.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campana-schott.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.