Skip to main content

Security report for camelot.exchange

Camelot DEX · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Camelot DEX is a decentralized exchange platform focused on providing liquidity and trading services within the Arbitrum blockchain ecosystem. It positions itself as a community-driven and capital-efficient liquidity network, aiming to serve cryptocurrency traders and DeFi users. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging about its role as the Orbital Liquidity Network. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, FontAwesome, and Cloudflare Web Analytics, hosted likely behind Cloudflare infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks some accessibility features. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, reducing compliance maturity. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits transparency. WHOIS data is unavailable due to unsupported TLD or privacy protection, common in crypto projects, which slightly reduces trust but is justified. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional with room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching camelot.exchange

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Camelot DEX operates in the decentralized finance sector, targeting users of the Arbitrum ecosystem. Its business model revolves around providing a decentralized exchange and liquidity network, leveraging community involvement and capital efficiency. The platform's market position is niche but important within the Arbitrum DeFi space. The company maintains active social media and community channels, indicating engagement and growth potential. Revenue streams likely include trading fees and liquidity incentives. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information is typical for crypto projects but may impact institutional trust. The partnership ecosystem includes major social platforms and documentation hubs, supporting user education and community building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No forms or inputs on the main page reduce attack surface. Lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates limited formal security governance. The use of Cloudflare analytics suggests some level of monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public-facing DeFi platform but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden security.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet compliance standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Camelot DEX
Description
Camelot DEX is an innovative and highly flexible decentralized exchange (DEX) built to support the Arbitrum ecosystem. It acts as the liquidity hub for the Arbitrum ecosystem, creating a network of aligned Orbit chains built on battle-tested infrastructure.
Key services
Decentralized exchange (DEX) trading, Liquidity provision, Orbital Liquidity Network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (FontAwesome 5.8.1), JavaScript, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Cloudflare Web Analytics
Platforms
Arbitrum ecosystem
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Web Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Web Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Strong social media presence with official Discord, Twitter, Telegram, Medium, and documentation links
  5. No forms present on the main page to collect user data
  6. Use of HTTPS and Cloudflare Web Analytics indicates modern hosting and analytics setup
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to unsupported TLD or privacy protection
  8. Content is focused on DeFi and liquidity network for Arbitrum ecosystem
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS with FontAwesome icons, and JavaScript. It uses Bootstrap-like classes for responsive design and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides performance and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are well implemented, supporting social sharing and search engine indexing. No CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. The absence of forms reduces complexity and security risks. The technical stack is appropriate for a decentralized finance platform's informational site but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with camelot.exchange. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review camelot.exchange.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.