Skip to main content

Security report for bytebetrieb.com

Bytebetrieb GmbH & Co KG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bytebetrieb GmbH & Co KG is a small, established internet agency based in Stuttgart, Germany, specializing in web design, programming, consulting, and online marketing services. With over 21 years of experience and a certified Google Partner status, the company offers comprehensive digital solutions including websites, online shops, product configurators, and mobile apps. Their target audience primarily consists of businesses and organizations seeking professional digital presence and marketing support. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern technologies such as WordPress, Magento, Shopware, and Google Maps API, reflecting a mature technical infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The missing WHOIS data for the domain introduces some trust concerns, but the overall professional presentation and clear contact information mitigate this risk. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and regular vulnerability audits to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bytebetrieb.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bytebetrieb.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bytebetrieb.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bytebetrieb operates in the competitive digital agency market in Germany, leveraging its long-standing experience and Google Partner certification to differentiate itself. The business model focuses on delivering tailored digital solutions and marketing campaigns, targeting SMEs and organizations requiring customized web and app development. The company maintains a portfolio of reputable clients and projects, indicating stable revenue streams and market presence. Partnerships with technology platforms like TYPO3 and Magento enhance their service offerings. Growth potential lies in expanding marketing services and strengthening security and compliance frameworks to meet evolving client demands and regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that could affect trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small agency but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans of third-party libraries and custom code.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing WHOIS data or domain registration details to improve trust.
  5. Maintain and update cookie consent and privacy mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bytebetrieb GmbH & Co KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bytebetrieb GmbH & Co KG
Description
Wir designen & programmieren, wir beraten & optimieren. Für das Internet, für Tablets & Smartphones und darüber hinaus. Unsere Kunden meinen, dass wir das ziemlich gut machen.
Key services
Website development, Online shops, Product configurators, Mobile apps, Online marketing, Search engine optimization, Google Ads campaigns, Social media marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, WordPress, Magento, Shopware, Strapi, FPS (proprietary development), jQuery, Google Maps API, Klaro cookie consent
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Social Media Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and business-focused
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence
  4. Uses modern CMS TYPO3 and integrates multiple technologies
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a notable anomaly
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust TYPO3 CMS platform supplemented by other popular technologies like WordPress, Magento, and Shopware, indicating flexibility and technical maturity. The use of jQuery and Google Maps API is standard for interactive features. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses Klaro for cookie consent, reflecting attention to privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from modernization in accessibility and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bytebetrieb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bytebetrieb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.