Skip to main content

Security report for byga.net

Byga · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Byga is a technology company offering a next-generation SaaS platform tailored for youth sports club management. The platform integrates multiple workflows including tryouts, registrations, payments, scheduling, resource management, and communication, targeting club leaders, coaches, and families. The website positions Byga as a comprehensive and innovative solution with a strong focus on customer experience and operational excellence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as service workers, SVG graphics, and a custom framework, delivering a mobile-optimized and visually appealing user experience. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers and incident response information are missing. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, Byga presents as a professional and credible business with a well-executed digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching byga.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention byga.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
153
Employees
0
Customers
153
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

53 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for byga.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Byga operates in the youth sports technology sector, providing an integrated club management platform. Its competitive advantage lies in sport-specific workflows and comprehensive feature sets that cover the entire season lifecycle. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting youth sports clubs across the nation. The website highlights partnerships with elite clubs and showcases customer testimonials, indicating a growing user base and market acceptance. The company maintains active social media channels for engagement. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, which may impact direct customer outreach. The lack of WHOIS transparency suggests either recent domain registration or privacy protection, warranting monitoring for legitimacy. The platform's modular features and mobile app support indicate a scalable and user-centric approach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses service workers to enhance performance and offline capabilities. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection is a gap that could be addressed to improve defense-in-depth. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in handling security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Monitor domain registration details and consider disclosing registrant information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Byga
Description
Byga is a next-generation club management platform designed specifically for youth sports organizations. It offers integrated technology solutions to streamline club operations including tryouts, registrations, payments, scheduling, resource management, team and game day management, communication, and oversight.
Key services
Tryouts Manager, Registration and Payments, Scheduling Engine, Resource Management, Teams and Game Day, Club Oversight, Communication Tools, Mobile App
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, SVG, Service Workers, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Skrollr (parallax scrolling), jQuery (implied by $ usage), Custom DMAPI framework
Platforms
Web, iOS and Android (native mobile apps mentioned)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite some cookies likely used
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript, SVG, and service workers. It leverages CDN providers such as Cloudfront and cdn-website.com for content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses parallax scrolling libraries like Skrollr. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and CSS optimizations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further improved. No common CMS like WordPress or Joomla was detected, indicating a bespoke platform. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and a rich user experience but would benefit from enhanced security header implementation and formalized privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with byga.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review byga.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.