Skip to main content

Security report for buttonevents.com

Button · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Button is a specialized event production company focused on content design conferences and workshops, targeting content designers and teams globally. The company positions itself as a leader in the content design event space, offering virtual conferences, monthly gatherings, and educational resources. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, and Umami Analytics, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching buttonevents.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Button operates in the technology sector, specifically within the niche of content design professional development. Its business model revolves around virtual event production and content delivery, monetizing through conference registrations, workshops, and related offerings. The company maintains a strong community presence and partnerships with notable organizations, as evidenced by event sponsorships and attendee companies. The use of third-party services like Mailchimp and Bonfire indicates a mature marketing and merchandising ecosystem. Growth indicators include recurring annual conferences and active content publication. The absence of detailed company registration data suggests a need for verification of corporate legitimacy. Strategic partnerships and a focused target audience position Button well within its market niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure form submissions. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency and may hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could delay mitigation in case of security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business type but with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting and demonstrate commitment to security.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to enable timely communication in case of security events.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries or services.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Button
Description
Button produces leading conferences, workshops, and events for content designers, focusing on skill development, community building, and industry insights.
Key services
Virtual conferences, Workshops, Monthly gatherings, Content design resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, Umami Analytics, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Secure forms with POST method
  • Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Umami Analytics, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Crazy Egg
Tracking pixels
Umami Analytics
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (via braintraffic.us2.list-manage.com)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found despite privacy policy presence
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered according to raw WHOIS output
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only
  6. Strong branding and consistent design throughout site
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  8. No incident response or security contact information provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern front-end technologies and third-party analytics and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, and Umami Analytics. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, ensuring consistent typography. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, contributing to fast load times and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations like focus-visible outlines. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical implementation is robust with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy mechanisms to further strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with buttonevents.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review buttonevents.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.