Redirects to consent.google.com; the website checks ran on that page, the DNS and email checks on business.site.
Google LLC · Technology · United States
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
The analyzed website is a Google consent management interface designed to handle user privacy and cookie preferences for Google services. It serves as a functional page within Google's ecosystem, providing users with control over their data consent in compliance with privacy regulations. The site is part of Google's broader infrastructure and reflects the company's market leadership in technology and internet services. The page itself is not a commercial or marketing site but a technical component of Google's privacy compliance framework. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Material Design Components, and strong security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and Content Security Policy with nonce attributes. The hosting is managed by Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible at a basic level, suitable for its functional purpose. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates excellent SSL configuration and security headers, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The JavaScript includes advanced measures to prevent prototype pollution and enforce object sealing, indicating a mature security posture. However, the page lacks explicit privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service links, which are likely hosted elsewhere within Google's domain. Overall, the site is trustworthy and legitimate, with domain registration details consistent with Google LLC. There are no signs of blocking or WAF challenges, and the content is safe for general audiences. Strategic recommendations include maintaining up-to-date security policies, enhancing privacy compliance disclosures on related pages, and continuing regular security audits to uphold the high security standards.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
The SPF record ends in "?all" (or has no "all"), so mail from unlisted servers gets a neutral result and SPF gives no protection against spoofing.
What to do: End the record with "-all", or "~all" while you confirm every sender is listed.
The DMARC policy is p=none, so mail that fails authentication is still delivered; the record only collects reports.
What to do: Review the aggregate reports, then move to p=quarantine and finally p=reject.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
The server still accepts TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.0, deprecated by RFC 8996. Modern browsers no longer use them, but they let outdated clients connect with weak cryptography.
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1; keep TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 (in CDN dashboards this is the "minimum TLS version" setting).
This scan found 8 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention business.site, from OffSeq Breach.
107 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for business.site.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with business.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review business.site.