Skip to main content

Security report for bsx.fi

TechStudio, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Basilisk (bsx.fi) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) and NFT platform focused on the Kusama blockchain ecosystem. It offers permissionless liquidity services including token swapping (Snek Swap), liquidity bootstrapping (Snek LBP), liquidity farming (Snek Farms), and an NFT marketplace integrated with Kodadot. The platform targets crypto users, DeFi participants, and NFT collectors, positioning itself as a community-first decentralized protocol with democratic governance. The business is operated by TechStudio, s.r.o., a Slovak technology company founded in 2021, consistent with the domain registration data. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted likely behind Cloudflare DNS services with DNSSEC enabled, ensuring good security and performance. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some security headers are missing. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no explicit contact or incident response information is provided, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and DNSSEC, but could be enhanced by adding security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. The site does not use advertising or tracking services, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but lacks formal privacy compliance documentation. Overall, Basilisk presents a credible and professional DeFi and NFT service with solid technical foundations and transparent WHOIS data. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security policies, and contact transparency would enhance trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bsx.fi

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Basilisk operates in the niche DeFi and NFT market on Kusama, leveraging decentralized liquidity and NFT trading. Its competitive advantage lies in permissionless liquidity provision and community governance. Revenue streams likely include trading fees, liquidity incentives, and NFT marketplace commissions. The target customers are crypto enthusiasts and developers in the Kusama ecosystem. The project maintains partnerships with Kodadot and integrates multiple wallet providers, indicating a growing ecosystem. Growth indicators include an active roadmap and ongoing feature development. The business model is decentralized finance with a community-first approach, supported by a Slovak technology company. The absence of privacy policies and contact info may limit institutional adoption but aligns with typical DeFi project norms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of DNS spoofing and ensuring encrypted communications. The use of Cloudflare nameservers adds resilience. However, the absence of key security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, which may pose regulatory risks for EU users. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved with formal policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TechStudio, s.r.o.
Registration number
48127761
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TechStudio, s.r.o.
Description
Snek brings permissionless liquidity to the Kusama ecosystem. Swap tokens, flip NFTs and earn rewards. Help young crypto projects bootstrap liquidity and receive tokens.
Key services
Token swapping (Snek Swap), Liquidity bootstrapping (Snek LBP), Liquidity farming (Snek Farms), NFT marketplace (Kodadot integration), Upcoming NFT auctions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS, Fontshare fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about DeFi and NFT services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact information or security incident contacts provided.
  4. Modern web technologies used with good mobile optimization.
  5. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Strong alignment between WHOIS data and website business information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services with DNSSEC, enhancing security and availability. The site is mobile optimized and uses web fonts from Fontshare. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and CSS. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for modernization. The site integrates external services such as Kodadot for NFTs and multiple wallet providers, showing a well-connected ecosystem. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bsx.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bsx.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.