Skip to main content

Security report for bsquared.network

B² Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

B² Network is a blockchain technology company specializing in Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions, AI integration, and DeFi platforms. It positions itself as a leading Bitcoin extension network with a significant user base and total value locked, offering services such as B² Hub & Rollup, bridges, AI infrastructure (DSN), stablecoin (U2), and mining and staking platforms. The company targets developers, BTC holders, miners, and AI agents, aiming to build an AI-native Bitcoin economy and enable Bitcoin-backed dollars in AI wallets. Technically, the website is built with modern frameworks like Next.js and Material-UI, providing a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is limited due to privacy or registry restrictions, common in blockchain domains, but the website and business indicators suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the blockchain technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bsquared.network

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

B² Network holds a strong market position as a Bitcoin Layer 2 extension network with backing from notable venture capital firms such as HashKey, OKX Ventures, IDG, Spartan, and Animoca. Its business model revolves around blockchain infrastructure, DeFi, and AI-driven financial products, including staking and mining services that generate yield for BTC holders. The company has a medium-sized presence with a growing ecosystem targeting developers, miners, and AI agents. Partnerships with major blockchain and crypto entities enhance its credibility and growth potential. The platform's integration with multiple blockchains and AI infrastructure indicates a forward-looking strategy focused on the convergence of blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies.

Security posture

The security maturity of B² Network is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the website content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a blockchain technology company but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider providing verified company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information if possible to reduce privacy-related trust concerns.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
B² Network
Description
B² Network is a Bitcoin Layer 2 extension network focused on providing infrastructure, AI integration, stablecoin solutions, and Bitcoin mining and DeFi platforms. It aims to enable Bitcoin-backed dollars in AI wallets and build an AI-native Bitcoin economy.
Key services
B² Hub & Rollup (Bitcoin Layer 2 infrastructure), B2 Bridge and BTC Bridge, DSN AI infrastructure, U2 stablecoin, Mining Squared platform, Buzz staking platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Material-UI, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, Material-UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD restrictions and privacy.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Strong branding and professional design with clear business focus on Bitcoin Layer 2 and AI integration.
  8. Social media presence is active with Twitter, Telegram, Discord, GitHub, Medium, and Docs links.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, with Material-UI for styling and components. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is appropriate for a blockchain technology company aiming for scalability and modern web standards. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO further by adding ARIA attributes and structured data markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bsquared.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bsquared.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.