Skip to main content

Security report for bscscan.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bscscan.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge page that blocks direct access to the site's content. This challenge page prevents extraction of meaningful business, security, or compliance information from the HTML content provided. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc. since 2020 and uses Cloudflare nameservers, indicating a legitimate setup for a technology service. However, no privacy policies, cookie policies, terms of service, contact information, or business descriptions are visible on the challenge page. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare's security services, but no further technology stack details are available. Due to the blocking mechanism, the security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the use of Cloudflare WAF is a positive security indicator. Overall, the site appears legitimate but inaccessible for detailed analysis at this time.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bscscan.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain age and registrar information suggest a medium-sized technology entity likely operating in the blockchain or cryptocurrency analytics sector, given the domain name 'bscscan.com'. However, no explicit business model, market positioning, or service descriptions are available from the blocked content. The lack of visible contact or policy information limits insights into customer engagement or compliance maturity. The use of Cloudflare indicates a focus on security and performance, common in competitive technology markets.

Security posture

The presence of Cloudflare Turnstile and WAF indicates a proactive security posture to mitigate automated attacks and abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers or detailed SSL/TLS configuration prevents a full security assessment. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are observable due to content blocking. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not detectable from the provided data. The security score is limited by the inability to analyze the actual site content.

Recommendations

  1. Provide a publicly accessible landing page or sitemap to allow automated analysis and improve SEO.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Include visible contact information and security incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Implement security headers and document security best practices publicly to demonstrate maturity.
  5. Consider reducing WAF challenge strictness for legitimate users and automated tools to enable better accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge (Turnstile captcha) blocking access to the actual website content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF, JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is currently blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile security challenge.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No forms or data collection fields visible except for the hidden captcha response input.
  5. No external links except Cloudflare domain for security scripts.
  6. No social media or contact emails found.
  7. No SEO or metadata tags present in the HTML.
  8. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details available from the HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with NameCheap and uses Cloudflare nameservers.
  10. Due to WAF blocking, detailed content and security analysis is not possible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected by Cloudflare's security platform, including Turnstile captcha and WAF, which blocks direct content access. The HTML content is minimal and focused on security verification rather than business or service information. No CMS or backend frameworks are detectable. The hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, a reputable provider. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical setup prioritizes security but limits content availability for analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bscscan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bscscan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.