Skip to main content

Security report for brucy.no

brucyno · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brucy is a technology company offering a modern website platform targeted at small to medium businesses primarily in Norway and Sweden. Their service model is subscription-based, providing complete website creation, SEO optimization, hosting, and maintenance with optional premium consulting services. The company positions itself as an affordable alternative to traditional web agencies and DIY platforms. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with good mobile optimization and fast performance. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are missing, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business-focused, with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brucy.no

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention brucy.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for brucy.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brucy operates in the competitive website creation market, leveraging a subscription model to attract businesses seeking affordable, hassle-free web solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in combining professional design and technical support with a simple pricing structure. The target customers are small businesses that want to avoid complex CMS platforms or expensive agencies. The company shows growth potential through premium service offerings and consulting. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media channels but no explicit third-party business partners were identified. The lack of public WHOIS data is consistent with Norid registry policies and does not detract from their market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR adherence. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish contact details for security incidents to enhance incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies and user tracking disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
brucyno
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
brucyno
Description
Brucy er en nettstedstjeneste der din bedrift får en rask nettside som yter på topp. Opprett deres nettside nå! Brucy tilbyr komplett nettside, SEO-optimalisering, hosting, oppdateringer, ubegrenset støtte og design. De tilbyr også premium tjenester med skreddersydde funksjoner, integrasjoner og markedsføringsautomatisering. Brucy Team tilbyr konsulenttjenester for tekniske implementeringer og SEO-prosjekter.
Key services
Website creation, SEO optimization, Hosting, Website maintenance and updates, Custom integrations, Marketing automation, Consulting and technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Platforms
Brucy proprietary platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to Norid registry policy; no registrant info exposed.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Vue.js).
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address in Sweden.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  6. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Nuxt.js and Vue.js) hosted on a CDN-backed infrastructure (cdn.brucy.io). It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and loads quickly. The use of import maps and modulepreload indicates modern frontend performance optimization techniques. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site lacks some security headers and privacy compliance pages, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brucy.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brucy.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.