Skip to main content

Security report for brucy.io

brucy.io · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brucy.io is a Swedish-based technology company offering a comprehensive website-as-a-service platform. Their business model is subscription-based, targeting small to large businesses seeking professional, fully managed websites with additional digital marketing and branding services. The company positions itself as a provider of high-quality, easy-to-use digital solutions with strong customer support and ongoing maintenance. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted on Google Cloud Platform, and employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers are missing and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, but the website's professional content and contact details support its legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brucy.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brucy.io operates in the technology sector, focusing on website development and digital strategy services. Their tiered pricing packages cater to different business sizes and needs, from startups to larger enterprises requiring customized solutions. The company leverages Google Cloud for hosting and emphasizes fast, secure website delivery. Their client portfolio includes multiple companies, indicating a growing market presence. The business model relies on recurring revenue through subscriptions, supplemented by bespoke development and marketing automation services. Social media engagement and visible client logos enhance credibility. The absence of detailed WHOIS data is mitigated by clear contact information and professional branding.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be improved to enhance trust and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security culture and customer trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness and reduce privacy concerns.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
brucy.io
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
brucy.io
Description
Brucy is a complete website platform, offered as a website-as-a-service. A straightforward, subscription-based, full-stack website solution. They provide professional websites built on their exclusive Brucy platform with ongoing support, SEO, branding, and digital strategy services.
Key services
Complete Website, Customized Solutions, Super-Fast Hosting on Google Cloud, SEO, Digital Strategy and Business Development, Support and Maintenance, Landing Pages and Campaign Pages, AI and Marketing Automation, Design, Logo, Visual Identity
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Cloud Platform, Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Fonts (Urbanist), reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Platforms
Google Cloud Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and is hosted on Google Cloud.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant; cookie policy is not explicitly found.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Multiple client logos and social media links indicate active business presence.
  8. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Nuxt.js and Vue.js, ensuring a performant and reactive user experience. Hosting on Google Cloud Platform provides scalability and reliability. The use of Google Fonts and CDN assets optimizes loading times. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The contact form integrates Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable technologies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brucy.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brucy.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.