Browser-Update.org is an established open source initiative founded in 2008 that provides a lightweight, customizable JavaScript tool to notify website visitors to update their web browsers. The service is widely adopted, with over 226,000 sites using its notification system, and it supports multiple languages and browsers. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and a focus on user privacy, avoiding tracking or personal data collection. The technical infrastructure is modern and performant, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and delivering a fast, mobile-optimized experience. Security posture is solid with domain protections in place, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and enabling DNSSEC. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and business credibility within the technology sector.
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
High
No SPF record found
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention browser-update.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for browser-update.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The project targets webmasters and website owners who want to improve user security and experience by encouraging browser updates. Its open source MIT license and extensive plugin ecosystem for popular CMS and frameworks indicate a strong community and integration focus. The business model revolves around providing a free, easy-to-implement tool that benefits the broader web ecosystem by reducing security risks associated with outdated browsers. The domain's long registration history and consistent WHOIS data support its legitimacy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a lean operation focused on digital engagement via the website and contact form.
Security posture
The website employs best practices such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and uses Cloudflare DNS, enhancing resilience against domain hijacking and DNS attacks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published, which are areas for enhancement. The site respects user privacy by not tracking visitors or collecting personal data, aligning with GDPR principles despite lacking a formal privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
Develop and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
Consider adding direct contact emails or phone numbers for business and security inquiries to enhance transparency.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
INWX GmbH
Description
Browser-update.org is a tool to unobtrusively notify visitors that they should update their web browser in order to use your website.
Key services
Browser update notification script, Customizable notification messages, Localization in multiple languages, Statistics and browser usage data
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
No tracking or personal data collection
Notification script is lightweight and unobtrusive
Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and autoRenewPeriod
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
excellent
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website provides a widely used open source tool for browser update notifications.
Content is technical, well-structured, and multilingual.
No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a minor compliance gap.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a contact page.
No security.txt or explicit security policies published.
No tracking or analytics scripts detected, respecting user privacy.
No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Website is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but no WAF challenge detected.
WHOIS data is consistent and domain is mature.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a simple but effective tech stack primarily based on JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, with no heavy frameworks detected. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, which provides reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and multilingual support. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates a privacy-first approach. Performance is fast due to lightweight scripts and minimal external dependencies. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, efficient, and well-suited to the site's purpose.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with browser-update.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review browser-update.org.