Skip to main content

Security report for brodokk.space

Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website brodokk.space serves as a personal homepage for an individual known as Brodokk, who identifies as a Fennec fox persona. The site highlights personal and professional programming activities, server management, and participation in various online communities and projects. The content is straightforward, primarily textual with some images, and links to multiple social media and community platforms. The website is small-scale and targeted at a general audience interested in technology and creative online communities. From a technical perspective, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted by Gandi SAS, and does not use any advanced frameworks or CMS. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious or minimalistic approach. Security posture is basic; the domain uses HTTPS (implied by the URL), but no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers are present. There are no forms or data collection points, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's personal nature, with no privacy protection used. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website is low risk, safe for general audiences, and serves as a personal portfolio and community hub. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, and enhancing mobile and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brodokk.space

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention brodokk.space, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for brodokk.space right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brodokk.space operates as a personal digital presence rather than a commercial business. The market positioning is that of an individual contributor in technology and creative online communities. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal programming projects, server management, and social engagement. Revenue streams or monetization are not evident. The target audience includes technology enthusiasts, community members in furry and VR spaces, and followers of the individual's projects. The partnership ecosystem is informal, linking to various social and creative platforms. Growth indicators are limited due to the personal nature of the site. Strategic observations suggest maintaining transparency and enhancing security and compliance to support trust and community engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level of brodokk.space is basic. The site benefits from domain transfer lock status and HTTPS usage but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No forms or input fields reduce exposure to injection attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. GDPR compliance is limited due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Data protection practices appear minimal but adequate for a personal site with no sensitive data collection. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not present. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a low-risk personal site but could be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of an individual named Brodokk, a Fennec fox persona, who programs professionally and personally, manages servers, and participates in various projects and groups.
Key services
Programming, Server management, Project participation
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal homepage for an individual named Brodokk.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  4. Multiple social media and community platform links are provided.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with website content.
  9. Website is simple, static, and low complexity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static site built with HTML and CSS, hosted by Gandi SAS. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site loads moderate content including images hosted on a CDN. Mobile optimization is basic, with a viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design frameworks. SEO is minimal with no Open Graph or structured data markup detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site performance is moderate, likely due to simple content and hosting. Technical risks are low but include lack of DNSSEC and security headers. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brodokk.space. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brodokk.space.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.