Skip to main content

Security report for broadcom.com

Broadcom Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

91/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Broadcom Inc. is a global technology leader specializing in semiconductor products, enterprise software, and security solutions. The company targets technology professionals, enterprises, and OEM partners, positioning itself as a major player in the technology sector with a broad portfolio of innovative products and services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and a comprehensive content offering aligned with its business model. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as React, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a high level of digital maturity. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a seamless user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and provides a dedicated security center with incident response contact information. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the absence of a publicly available security.txt file and detailed certifications suggests room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and compliance posture. The main concern lies in the lack of WHOIS data transparency, which may be due to privacy protection but warrants monitoring. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security disclosure practices and improving WHOIS data accuracy to bolster trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of broadcom.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching broadcom.com

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
91

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention broadcom.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
103,166
Employees
31
Customers
102,563
Third parties
572
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-16 · 286 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for broadcom.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.broadcom.com2026-06-16
  • –login.broadcom.com2026-06-15
  • –api.asm.saas.broadcom.com2026-06-13
  • –axa.dxi-na1.saas.broadcom.com2026-06-02
  • –api.asm.saas.broadcom.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Broadcom operates in the technology sector with a focus on semiconductors and enterprise software solutions. Its business model is B2B, serving large enterprises and OEMs globally. The company leverages a strong brand presence and a comprehensive support ecosystem, including a dedicated support portal and security center. Market positioning is strong, with a focus on innovation in AI infrastructure and security. The multilingual website and localized domains indicate a global reach and customer segmentation strategy. Partnerships and related domains support a robust service delivery network.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The presence of a security center and incident response contacts indicates readiness to handle security incidents. However, the lack of a security.txt file and publicly listed certifications or compliance frameworks suggests gaps in transparency and formal compliance communication. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and certification visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  2. Publicly list security certifications and compliance frameworks to enhance trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Update WHOIS information to improve transparency and domain legitimacy.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Broadcom Inc.
Description
Broadcom Inc. is a global technology leader that designs, develops and supplies a broad range of semiconductor, enterprise software and security solutions.
Key services
Semiconductor products, Enterprise software, Security solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Webpack (bundled JS), Bootstrap (CSS framework)
Frameworks
React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Security center with incident response info
  • Support portal login with secure forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on technology and enterprise solutions
  3. Multiple language support with localized domains
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data missing, possibly due to privacy protection or registry issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with bundled JavaScript assets, leveraging Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The CSS is managed with Bootstrap and custom styles, ensuring responsive design and accessibility. Performance is optimized with deferred script loading and font preloading. The site is hosted on a platform supporting HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to improve documentation of security practices and WHOIS data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 91/100Low15 findingsView report
  2. 91/100 +8Low15 findingsView report
  3. 83/100Low17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with broadcom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review broadcom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.