Skip to main content

Security report for broadcom.com

Broadcom Inc. · Technology · N/A

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Broadcom Inc. is a global technology leader specializing in semiconductor, enterprise software, and security solutions. The company positions itself as a major player in the technology sector, targeting enterprise customers and technology partners worldwide. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site is built using React and hosted on Cloudflare, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party marketing and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with multiple security headers and a valid TLS certificate, although it lacks support for modern TLS protocols and DNS security enhancements. Privacy and security policies are not explicitly found in the provided content, indicating potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in security protocol modernization and policy disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of broadcom.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching broadcom.com

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention broadcom.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
103,166
Employees
31
Customers
102,563
Third parties
572
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-16 · 286 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for broadcom.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.broadcom.com2026-06-16
  • –login.broadcom.com2026-06-15
  • –api.asm.saas.broadcom.com2026-06-13
  • –axa.dxi-na1.saas.broadcom.com2026-06-02
  • –api.asm.saas.broadcom.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Broadcom operates in the technology sector with a focus on semiconductor and enterprise software markets. Its business model revolves around product development and software solutions for large enterprises. The company maintains a strong market position as a global leader, supported by a broad portfolio of services. The website's integration with multiple marketing and analytics platforms suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement. However, the absence of visible contact information and policy documents in the analyzed content may impact customer trust and compliance perception. The partnership ecosystem includes domains like avagoresponsecenter.com and searchunify.broadcom.com, indicating collaboration with specialized service providers.

Security posture

The website employs robust security headers including HSTS with preload, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and XSS protection, indicating a strong baseline security posture. The SSL certificate is valid and issued by a reputable CA, but the lack of enabled TLS 1.2 or 1.3 protocols is a notable weakness. DNS security features such as DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, which could expose the domain to certain DNS-based attacks. No public security or incident response policies were found, nor was a security.txt file present, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing tools raises privacy considerations, though a cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by modernizing encryption protocols and improving policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen encryption and comply with modern security standards.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to improve DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, security, and incident response policies prominently on the website.
  4. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Review and optimize third-party tracking tools to enhance user privacy and comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a React framework and utilizes Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services, ensuring fast load times and global availability. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics services including Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses modern font loading strategies and preconnect hints to optimize performance. However, the absence of modern TLS protocols and DNS security features suggests technical debt in security infrastructure. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features, with good SEO practices evident from metadata and Open Graph tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security protocol updates and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 91/100Low15 findingsView report
  2. 91/100Low15 findingsView report
  3. 91/100Low15 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with broadcom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review broadcom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.