Skip to main content

Security report for bristolgynaecology.com

ExpiredDomains.com · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ExpiredDomains.com operates as a specialized platform aggregating expired and expiring domain names, providing users with detailed domain metrics and facilitating purchases through trusted registrars such as GoDaddy. The platform targets domain investors, SEO professionals, and businesses seeking premium domain assets. It holds a strong market position as a trusted resource with comprehensive listings and user testimonials. Technically, the website employs modern web standards with a clean, responsive design and uses Cloudflare DNS and HTTPS for security. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The security posture is solid but could be improved with additional best practices. Privacy compliance is basic with visible privacy and cookie policies but no explicit GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with a good balance of content quality and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bristolgynaecology.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on domain marketplace aggregation, generating revenue likely through affiliate partnerships with registrars like GoDaddy. The platform offers extensive domain data, filtering, and insights, appealing to a niche but significant market segment of domain investors and marketers. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive data, daily updates, and integration with major registrars. The company maintains a consistent brand and active social media presence, enhancing trust and user engagement. Growth potential exists through expanding domain metrics, improving user experience, and enhancing security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare DNS usage. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no detailed GDPR adherence. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting limited transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by explicitly addressing GDPR and other relevant regulations in the privacy policy.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Increase transparency by providing verified contact information and security incident reporting channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ExpiredDomains.com
Description
ExpiredDomains.com is a platform that aggregates and lists expired and expiring domain names for sale, providing domain insights and facilitating purchases via external registrars such as GoDaddy.
Key services
Expired domain listings, Domain metrics and insights, Links to domain purchase on registrars (e.g., GoDaddy), Search and filtering tools for domains
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, SVG icons, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on expired domain sales with detailed domain metrics and purchase options.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided on the page.
  4. Social media presence is strong with multiple official channels linked.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies are published.
  6. Site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies. It employs SVG icons and Cloudflare DNS for performance and security. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading for videos and images. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adopting modern security headers and improving accessibility compliance. The hosting environment is stable, leveraging Cloudflare and GoDaddy services.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bristolgynaecology.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bristolgynaecology.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.