Skip to main content

Security report for brillmark.com

BrillMark LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BrillMark LLC is a specialized technology service provider focusing on high-velocity A/B test development, conversion rate optimization (CRO) support, and custom web development. The company targets CRO agencies, marketers, and businesses seeking to accelerate their testing and growth efforts. Their market position is supported by extensive experience, having executed over 15,000 tests and maintaining partnerships with major CRO platforms such as Convert and Optimizely. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with detailed service offerings and client testimonials, indicating a medium-sized, established business in the technology sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartlook. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts trustworthiness despite the professional website content. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brillmark.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BrillMark operates as a service provider in the CRO and web development space, offering a comprehensive suite of services including A/B test development, Shopify and WordPress development, full stack solutions, design, QA, and technical support. Their competitive advantage lies in their deep expertise, high testing velocity, and integration with leading CRO tools. The business model is primarily B2B outsourcing and partnership-based, targeting CRO agencies and marketers. The company demonstrates growth through client testimonials and strategic partnerships. The website's ecosystem includes social media channels and marketing tools that support lead generation and client engagement. However, the lack of public domain registration data and privacy policies suggests areas for operational improvement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policy publication, and third-party script management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Establish and publicize a security incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BrillMark LLC
Description
BrillMark delivers high-velocity A/B test development, CRO Support, and Custom web development — seamlessly integrating with your team to drive real results across any platform without overburdening your resources.
Key services
A/B Test Development, Shopify Development, WordPress Development, Full Stack Development, Design & Mockups, CRO Support, Technical Support, Quality Assurance, Dedicated Development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar, Smartlook, jQuery, Font Awesome, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Sweet Scroll
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar, Smartlook
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Smartlook, MobileMonkey
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used extensively.
  5. Contact information includes a phone number and multiple contact forms but no public email addresses.
  6. Strong branding and consistent messaging focused on CRO and web development services.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging a variety of JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as jQuery, Font Awesome, Swiper.js, AOS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar, and Smartlook. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich content. No hosting provider details were identified. The technical stack is mature and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brillmark.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brillmark.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.