Skip to main content

Security report for breinify.ai

Breinify Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Breinify Inc. operates a mature AI-powered personalization platform targeting D2C marketers in e-commerce, retail, grocery, and CPG sectors. The company offers omnichannel personalization solutions that automate consumer engagement across web, email, SMS, app, and APIs. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and demonstrates strong branding consistency with trust signals such as customer testimonials and industry recognitions. Technically, the site is built on HubSpot CMS with modern marketing and analytics tools integrated, but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy, although no terms of service or explicit security policies are found. The domain registration is consistent with the business information, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a credible business front but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching breinify.ai

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Breinify holds a strong market position as a trusted AI personalization provider with a B2B SaaS business model. Its key competitive advantages include rapid deployment capabilities, proprietary Temporal AI technology, and strategic partnerships with leading brands. The company targets medium to large enterprises in retail and CPG, focusing on driving engagement and revenue through data-driven personalization. The website content and marketing tools reflect a mature digital presence, supporting lead generation and customer education. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel primarily via contact forms. The company’s domain age and registration details support its established market presence.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of security headers, and no DNSSEC implementation. While no active vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the missing HTTPS severely impacts user trust and data protection. The cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicate awareness of privacy regulations, but the lack of incident response contacts or security policies limits transparency. The site uses modern analytics and tracking tools responsibly, but the overall security configuration requires immediate enhancement to meet industry best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across all domains.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish a clear terms of service and security policy page to improve transparency.
  5. Add explicit incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and security communication.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics scripts including Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Despite a modern tech stack, the site suffers from slow performance with a load time of over 7 seconds and a large number of resources (87). Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The absence of HTTPS and security headers poses technical risks. The site’s SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social sharing and search visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with breinify.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review breinify.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.