Skip to main content

Security report for branchtrack.com

BranchTrack · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BranchTrack operates as a specialized experiential learning platform focused on delivering simulation-based training solutions to Learning & Development professionals and business managers. The platform offers no-code authoring tools, seamless LMS integrations, and live session capabilities, positioning itself as a scalable and user-friendly solution for corporate training. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and user engagement tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, but the professional website and business content suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but has room for improvement in business credibility and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 26 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching branchtrack.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BranchTrack targets corporate L&D teams, instructional designers, and business managers across multiple industries, offering a SaaS platform for creating and delivering interactive simulations. Its competitive advantage lies in no-code authoring, data-driven learner analytics, and integration with popular authoring tools and LMSs. The company appears to serve both SMBs and Fortune 500 clients, indicating a flexible market approach. Revenue likely derives from subscription plans and enterprise licensing. The ecosystem includes related domains for demos, blogs, and community support, enhancing customer engagement. Strategic observations include the need to clarify domain registration and enhance security policy transparency to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response plan limit its security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, suggesting areas for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance business credibility by adding more contact channels such as phone numbers and physical addresses where appropriate.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BranchTrack
Description
BranchTrack is an experiential learning platform designed to save lives by enabling the design, delivery, and tracking of learner experiences through robust, scalable, and user-friendly simulation tools.
Key services
No-code authoring tool for simulations, Delivery platform for experiential learning, Integration with LMS and authoring tools, Live sessions with real-time feedback, Data-driven learner behavior analytics, Mobile native learning experiences, AI co-pilot for content creation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Lora, Nunito), Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Finsweet Cookie Consent, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, performant infrastructure using Webflow CMS, with integration of popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The technical implementation is clean with valid HTML and CSS, and no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and add more explicit technical documentation for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with branchtrack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review branchtrack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.