Skip to main content

Security report for botario.com

botario · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Botario is a German-based technology company specializing in AI-driven communication automation solutions, including voicebots and chatbots for customer service across web, app, and telephone channels. The company targets businesses of all sizes, offering both cloud and local deployment options. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on contemporary web technologies such as Astro and Swiper.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Usercentrics, but lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security headers. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the company's credibility. Overall, Botario presents as a credible mid-sized technology business with room to improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching botario.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention botario.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for botario.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Botario operates in the AI and telecommunications sector, leveraging partnerships with NFON AG as indicated by URL structures and branding. The business model focuses on B2B SaaS offerings for intelligent customer communication automation. The company benefits from a solid technical foundation and a clear market positioning as an AI automation provider. Growth potential is supported by cloud and local deployment flexibility. However, the absence of explicit contact details and compliance documentation may limit trust for some customers. Strategic partnerships and integrations, such as with Typeform and Usercentrics, enhance their ecosystem. The company should consider publishing more comprehensive compliance and security information to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable consent management platform (Usercentrics) for cookie compliance, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The lack of explicit privacy and terms of service pages reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices such as security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  3. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
botario
Description
botario automatisiert Kundenanfragen mit KI-gestützten Sprach- und Chatbots – über Web, App oder Telefon. Läuft lokal oder in der Cloud für Unternehmen jeder Größe.
Key services
KI-gestützte Sprachbots, Chatbots, Kundenanfragen Automatisierung, Web, App und Telefon Integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typeform embed, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
Astro (implied by data-astro-cid attributes), Swiper.js (slider library)
Platforms
Web, Cloud hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and scripts)
  • Cookie consent via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Usercentrics (consent management)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and business-oriented with clear focus on AI communication automation.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks like Astro and Swiper.js.
  7. Hosting and DNS managed via AWS infrastructure.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Astro framework and Swiper.js for UI components, with integrations such as Typeform for forms and Usercentrics for consent management. Hosting and DNS are managed via AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is well-chosen for scalability and maintainability, though some technical debt may exist in the form of missing security headers and incomplete compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with botario.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review botario.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.