Skip to main content

Security report for bonit.cz

BONIT Solutions, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BONIT Solutions, s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based small IT services company specializing in consulting, IT infrastructure, security solutions, and custom software development. Their website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services including firewall and VPN deployment, server management, software integration, and programming. The company targets businesses needing secure and efficient IT systems. Technically, the website uses modern frontend libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel, is mobile-optimized, and includes basic privacy and cookie compliance features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and basic form anti-spam, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and privacy compliance but could improve in security best practices and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bonit.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Technology sector, focusing on B2B IT consulting and infrastructure services. Their market position is that of a specialized provider with a strong emphasis on security and integration. They maintain partnerships with several regional companies and institutions, enhancing their credibility. The business model relies on service delivery including consulting, implementation, and custom software development. The website content suggests a stable, small-sized company with a professional approach to client engagement and service offerings. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not currently contradict the business narrative presented.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and forms include simple anti-spam measures. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or security policy pages are present, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency is a concern for trust but does not directly indicate compromise. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or more robust anti-bot mechanisms to reduce spam and abuse risk.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BONIT Solutions, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ06885641
Registration number
06885641
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BONIT Solutions, s.r.o.
Description
Společnost BONIT Solutions, s.r.o. tvoří tým specialistů s dlouholetými zkušenosti v oblasti internetu, sítí, serverové infrastruktury a software. Nabízí konzultační služby, návrh a dodávku firewallů, bezpečného propojení mezi firemními pobočkami, VPN přístupů, serverové infrastruktury a zálohování. Analyzuje, navrhuje, implementuje a integruje sofistikované informační a komunikační systémy s cílem co nejvyššího využití jejich potenciálu. Řešení zahrnují systémy pro správu dokumentů (DMS), komunikační a helpdeskové systémy, specializovaná softwarová řešení, komplexní integraci a vizualizaci dat.
Key services
Consulting, Security (firewalls, VPN, network monitoring), Server installation and management, System integration and database optimization, Software implementation (DMS, LMS, helpdesk), Custom software programming and reverse engineering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https://)
  • Contact form with basic antispam measures

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is complete and includes multiple communication channels.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Technical stack is modern but limited to frontend libraries.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Website is business-focused, targeting IT infrastructure and software services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack with jQuery 3.6.0 and Owl Carousel for UI components, and FontAwesome for icons. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and labels, though accessibility could be improved. Performance is moderate with some large images in the slider. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating a privacy-conscious setup. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bonit.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bonit.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.