Skip to main content

Security report for bohnenkamp-stiftung.de

Friedel & Gisela Bohnenkamp-Stiftung · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Friedel & Gisela Bohnenkamp-Stiftung is a regional non-profit foundation based in Germany focused on supporting and developing educational projects primarily in the Osnabrück area. Their website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on TYPO3 CMS, featuring clear information about their mission, projects, and contact details. The foundation emphasizes sustainable and innovative educational initiatives targeting children and youth, reflecting a strong community and regional engagement. Technically, the site is modern, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, but lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid but could be improved with formal policies and disclosures. Overall, the website is trustworthy, informative, and serves its audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bohnenkamp-stiftung.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the education and non-profit sectors, with a clear regional focus on Osnabrück. It leverages partnerships and funding to support educational projects, positioning itself as a key player in local educational development. The business model is grant and project-based funding with a strong emphasis on sustainability and innovation. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a stable market position in its niche. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The foundation maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting its credibility and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, which is positive. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and does not provide a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Tracking is done via Website-Tracking.com without explicit cookie consent, which may raise privacy concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Friedel & Gisela Bohnenkamp-Stiftung
Description
Die Friedel & Gisela Bohnenkamp-Stiftung unterstützt innovative, fachlich fundierte und nachhaltige Bildungsprojekte, die Bildungschancen von Kindern und Jugendlichen verbessern, vorrangig in der Stadt und im Landkreis Osnabrück.
Key services
Funding educational projects, Developing educational initiatives, Partnering with local institutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Website-Tracking.com
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Website-Tracking.com
Marketing tools
Website-Tracking.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German with English alternate links.
  3. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie banners visible, though privacy policy page exists.
  6. Use of TYPO3 CMS and Bootstrap framework indicates modern CMS usage.
  7. Tracking via Website-Tracking.com is present but no major ad networks.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No incident response or security contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and modern JavaScript, ensuring responsive design and good accessibility. Performance is moderate with compressed CSS and JS assets. The site uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO and multi-language support. No major technical debt or outdated libraries are evident. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS uses ns1.ns-serve.net and ns2.ns-serve.net. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and cookie management to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bohnenkamp-stiftung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bohnenkamp-stiftung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.