Skip to main content

Security report for bodis.com

Bodis LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bodis LLC operates a domain monetization platform that enables domain investors and registrars to monetize, manage, and sell undeveloped domains. The company emphasizes smart features such as automated revenue optimization, SSL certificate provisioning, and commission-free sales management. The website presents a professional and modern interface targeting domain investors and registrars, positioning itself as a competitive player in the domain monetization industry since 2007. Technically, the site leverages modern frontend frameworks like Vue.js and Vuetify, integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, and uses CookieYes for cookie consent management. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and provides automatic SSL certificates, but lacks some recommended security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness slightly, though the business presence and external endorsements support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, but could improve transparency around security and contact information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bodis.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bodis.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bodis targets domain investors and registrars with a SaaS-like platform offering domain parking, sales, and management services. Its business model includes revenue optimization technology and direct advertiser relationships to maximize domain monetization. The company benefits from industry endorsements and provides commission-free sales options, appealing to domain owners seeking control over their sales leads. The platform's advanced management and reporting features cater to both small and large domain portfolios. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on technology sector clients. The lack of physical address or phone contact on the website suggests a primarily digital operation. Partnerships with domain industry organizations enhance credibility. Growth indicators include continuous feature innovation and client-driven enhancements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and automatic SSL certificate issuance. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with granular controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program is publicly available, which limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party analytics and support tools but should regularly audit these for security risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add more comprehensive contact information such as a phone number and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bodis LLC
Description
Monetize, manage, and sell undeveloped domains using smart features designed to maximize revenue.
Key services
Domain monetization, Domain management, Domain sales with 0% commission, Automated revenue optimization, SSL certificate provisioning, Advanced reporting and filtering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Vuetify, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieYes (cookie consent), Reamaze (customer support chat)
Frameworks
Vue.js, Vuetify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Automatic SSL certificate generation
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
YouTube
Marketing tools
Reamaze
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or missing, which is unusual for an established business.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Vue.js, Vuetify).
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented and visible.
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  6. Contact primarily via email and support knowledge base.
  7. Security headers could be improved.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Business information is clear and consistent with domain monetization industry.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Vue.js and Vuetify, providing a responsive and visually appealing user interface. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics enables detailed visitor tracking and performance analysis. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads a variety of JavaScript chunks and external scripts for functionality and analytics. Performance is moderate with no significant delays noted in the content. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or SPA-based architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 +1Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bodis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bodis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.