Skip to main content

Security report for bodis.com

Bodis LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bodis LLC operates a domain monetization platform focused on helping domain investors and registrars maximize revenue from undeveloped domains. The company offers automated optimization technology, SSL provisioning, direct advertiser partnerships, and advanced domain management tools. Their market position is supported by industry endorsements and testimonials, targeting medium-sized domain owners and registrars. Technically, the website leverages modern frontend frameworks such as Vue.js and Vuetify, integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, and employs a cookie consent management system for privacy compliance. However, the website suffers from a critical security issue due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which significantly impacts its security posture. The DNS configuration is well-managed with SPF and DMARC policies in place, but the lack of security headers and HTTPS reduces trust and security. Overall, the site provides a professional user experience with good content quality and privacy compliance but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bodis.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bodis.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bodis LLC has positioned itself as a key player in the domain monetization industry by offering a comprehensive suite of services including domain optimization, sales facilitation, and management tools. Their business model focuses on providing value to domain investors and registrars through technology-driven revenue maximization and direct advertiser relationships. The company benefits from strategic partnerships and endorsements from domain industry organizations, enhancing credibility. Revenue streams likely include commissions from domain monetization and sales services, with options for commission-free sales to empower users. The platform's growth is supported by continuous feature innovation and a focus on user experience. The absence of phone contact and physical address on the website suggests a primarily digital and remote business operation.

Security posture

The current security posture of the Bodis website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While DNS security practices such as SPF and DMARC are properly configured, the absence of HTTPS and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options undermines the overall security. The site implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. Immediate remediation of SSL and TLS issues is critical to improve security and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all user interactions.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable insecure protocols to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used and maintain privacy compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Vuetify, providing a responsive and user-friendly interface. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for data collection and performance monitoring, alongside a cookie consent management system from CookieYes to comply with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be managed via Bodis's own nameservers with email services routed through Google and Amazon SES. Performance is moderate with a load time of approximately 5.4 seconds and a page size of around 432 KB, which is acceptable but could be optimized further. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and security risk. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The site includes a live chat widget powered by Reamaze, enhancing customer support capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 −4Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bodis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bodis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.