Skip to main content

Security report for bnibusinessbuilder.com

Schoox · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Schoox operates a professional learning management system platform designed to empower organizations with innovative LMS solutions for employee training, engagement, and development. The website analyzed is a login portal for the Schoox LMS, featuring integration with Google Sign-In and mobile app download links, targeting organizational users. The platform positions itself as a SaaS provider in the education technology sector with a medium-sized market presence. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as AngularJS and libraries like jQuery and MomentJS, alongside device fingerprinting and Google APIs. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The presence of CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA integration indicates attention to security, although no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by the URL), secure form practices, and spam prevention mechanisms. However, the absence of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security hardening and privacy compliance. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found, but a help widget provides a contact form. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains, but the main domain schoox.com is a known legitimate LMS provider. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional LMS login portal with good technical implementation and business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bnibusinessbuilder.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Schoox is positioned as an important entity in the education sector, providing a SaaS learning management system targeting organizations that require employee training and development solutions. The business model revolves around subscription-based LMS services, with key offerings including training management, engagement tools, and development resources. The platform integrates with major ecosystems such as Google for authentication and mobile app stores for accessibility. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and provides clear legal policies, supporting its credibility. The external link to bnitos.com is an outlier and may represent a partner or legacy link requiring further validation. No direct contact details were found, suggesting a focus on digital self-service and support via embedded help widgets. The company likely operates at a medium scale with a focus on technology-driven education solutions.

Security posture

The security posture of the Schoox login portal is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive security practices. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA in the help widget helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms policies linked but no cookie consent mechanism present. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on the login page. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, published security policies, and improved privacy mechanisms to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schoox
Description
Schoox is a powerful learning management system that helps organizations train, engage, and develop their employees.
Key services
Learning management system, Employee training, Engagement and development tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, jQuery, MomentJS, FingerprintJS, Google API client
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token in login form
  • Password field with show/hide toggle
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration in help widget

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Sign-In
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Schoox LMS platform
  2. No WHOIS data available for subdomain, expected behavior
  3. Privacy and terms policies are linked and accessible
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on login page
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Sign-In integration
  6. No visible security headers in HTML content
  7. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found
  8. External link to bnitos.com is unusual and may warrant review
  9. Help widget includes reCAPTCHA for spam prevention
  10. Mobile app download links present for iOS and Android
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript technology stack including AngularJS, jQuery, MomentJS, and FingerprintJS for device identification. Google APIs are integrated for authentication and analytics-related functions. The site is structured with responsive design elements but shows only basic mobile optimization. Performance appears moderate with no evident broken elements. The login form includes CSRF protection and password visibility toggling, indicating attention to user security and usability. However, the lack of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. Hosting details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a functional and professional LMS login portal but requires enhancements in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bnibusinessbuilder.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bnibusinessbuilder.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.