Skip to main content

Security report for bmms.lv

Rīgas Bolderājas Mūzikas un Mākslas skola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Bolderājas Mūzikas un Mākslas skola is a Latvian educational institution specializing in music and arts education. The website serves as an informational portal for students, parents, and community members, offering details about courses, events, and school activities. The institution appears to be a small-sized local school focused on cultural and artistic education within the Rīga Bolderāja area. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and design quality, although no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate with no visible analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, which lowers the security posture score. No forms or sensitive data collection points are present, reducing immediate risk. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, but no incident response or security policies are found. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and suitable for its educational purpose. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits and lack of explicit contact information slightly reduce trust and business credibility scores. Strategic improvements in security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bmms.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates as a non-profit educational entity focused on music and arts education, targeting students and community members in Latvia. Its business model centers on providing structured educational programs and extracurricular activities. The website positions the school as a local cultural hub with a clear focus on education rather than commercial activities. There is no evidence of revenue-generating services or partnerships from the website content. The lack of visible contact details and WHOIS transparency limits external business intelligence. The school likely relies on local government or community funding and serves a niche educational segment. No subsidiaries or parent companies are indicated.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no advanced security headers or visible HTTPS enforcement detected in the provided data. The absence of contact information for incident response and lack of security policies indicate limited security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is supported by the presence of cookie and privacy policies. The institution should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and publishing incident response contacts to improve security readiness and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding a security policy and incident response information to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Bolderājas Mūzikas un Mākslas skola
Description
Rīgas Bolderājas Mūzikas un Mākslas skola is an educational institution focused on music and arts education, offering various programs in music, visual arts, and related extracurricular activities.
Key services
Music education, Visual arts education, Extracurricular projects and competitions, Community cultural events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website is an educational institution in Latvia focused on music and arts.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible in Latvian language.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage or main navigation.
  6. No forms detected in the homepage HTML content.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  8. Uses external resources from Font Awesome and Google Fonts.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML content. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and design quality. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or analytics detected. The lack of security headers and HTTPS enforcement are technical risks that should be addressed. No forms or dynamic content were found, reducing complexity but also limiting interactivity. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bmms.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bmms.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.