Skip to main content

Security report for bluefieldagency.com

Blue Field Agency · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blue Field Agency is a Dutch technology-focused digital agency specializing in AI-driven data analytics, creative design, and training services. Established in 2012, it serves business clients seeking to leverage AI and data for impactful growth. The company offers a range of services including AI content assistants (AI Buddys), analytics, technology consulting, and benchmarking. Their market position is supported by ISO certifications and a strong partnership ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies and fonts. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some security headers are missing. The hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the company's profile. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and ISO 27001 certification, but improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and business-oriented digital presence with moderate to good technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements in security practices and incident response transparency would enhance their risk posture and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bluefieldagency.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blue Field Agency operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses interested in AI and data-driven marketing and design solutions. Their business model is B2B service provision with revenue streams likely from consulting, training, software tools, and content creation services. The company has a medium size and over a decade of market presence, supported by partnerships with universities and industry organizations. Their competitive advantage lies in combining AI, data, and design expertise with certifications and a strong client testimonial base. Growth indicators include active event participation and a diverse service portfolio.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. The company enforces HTTPS and holds ISO 27001 certification, indicating a formalized security management system. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP or HSTS suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response plan or security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blue Field Agency
Description
Blue Field Agency helps organizations grow impactfully by leveraging data, AI, and effective design to optimize processes, personalize interactions, and accelerate content creation.
Key services
AI training and masterclasses, Data analytics, Creative design, Technology consulting, Benchmarking, AI-powered content assistants (AI Buddys)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Fonts (Roboto, Inter, Rubik), JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS framework
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ISO 27001 certification

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Ads Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, HubSpot Collected Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch language targeting business clients.
  3. Strong emphasis on AI, data analytics, and design services.
  4. Multiple ISO certifications and privacy compliance indicators present.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools indicates modern digital infrastructure.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend improvement.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  10. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging modern web standards and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The use of HubSpot marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. However, the absence of certain security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security hardening. The domain is hosted on HubSpot's infrastructure, ensuring reliable uptime and support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bluefieldagency.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bluefieldagency.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.