Skip to main content

Security report for bluebridge.lt

BlueBridge · Technology · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BlueBridge is a Lithuanian IT services company specializing in comprehensive IT infrastructure solutions for businesses, including software deployment, maintenance, data management, cybersecurity, and network services. The company positions itself as a professional and reliable IT partner for enterprises seeking efficient and secure IT solutions. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as WPBakery and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and technical infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms via Cookiebot, demonstrating awareness of privacy compliance requirements. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and consent management in place; however, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response information indicates areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business's founding year, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing contact transparency, and implementing additional security headers to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bluebridge.lt

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BlueBridge operates in the technology sector, targeting business clients in Lithuania with IT infrastructure and cybersecurity services. The business model is B2B, focusing on delivering tailored IT solutions to enterprises. The company is newly founded in 2024, with a domain registration date matching this timeline. The website content and structure suggest a professional approach with good SEO practices and modern CMS usage. The lack of visible certifications or trust badges may limit perceived credibility. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The company appears to be in an early growth phase, emphasizing service quality and digital presence. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and compliance. The absence of detailed business contact information and policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management, which are positive security indicators. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response plan. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited transparency in security practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the analysis. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing clear security policies, implementing additional HTTP security headers, and providing incident response contacts to improve readiness and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user agreements and security commitments.
  3. Implement and publicize an incident response plan and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and secure validation to prevent injection and abuse.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BlueBridge
Description
Teikiame visą IT infrastruktūra apimančias IT paslaugas verslui - programinės įrangos diegimą, priežiūrą, duomenų valdymą, kibernetinio saugumo, tinklų ir kitusi efektyvius IT sprendimus įmonėms.
Key services
programinės įrangos diegimą, priežiūrą, duomenų valdymą, kibernetinio saugumo, tinklų sprendimus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare DNS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • Google Tag Manager with consent settings

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with clear consent mechanism
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses modern CMS (WordPress) with common plugins and SEO tools
  6. Security headers not explicitly detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims
  8. No visible security or vulnerability disclosures
  9. No incident response or security contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard and widely supported technology stack. Hosting appears to be through Telia Lietuva with DNS managed by Cloudflare, providing DNS-level security and performance benefits. The site loads multiple fonts and scripts, including jQuery and Google Tag Manager, which are common but require maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Performance is moderate with some preloading of fonts and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is well addressed via meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bluebridge.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bluebridge.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.