Skip to main content

Security report for blue-pool.cz

BluePool s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BluePool s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based IT consulting company founded in 2013, specializing in providing IT professionals and teams primarily to banking, insurance, telecommunications, and government sectors. The company emphasizes partnership, professional growth, and a human approach, delivering services such as analysis, software development, testing, project management, and long-term application support. Their client base includes major banks and public institutions, positioning them as a trusted local IT consulting firm. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is custom-built without a CMS, hosted likely by WEDOS, and demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, and no advanced security headers are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a domain age appropriate for the company's history and no privacy protection, which supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but has room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. The absence of privacy and terms of service policies is a notable compliance gap. Strategic enhancements in security headers, accessibility, and formal privacy documentation would strengthen the company's digital maturity and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blue-pool.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BluePool operates in a competitive IT consulting market, focusing on large enterprises and public sector clients in banking, insurance, telecommunications, and government. Their business model combines fixed-price and time/material contracts, delivering IT professionals and teams for analysis, development, testing, and project management. The company leverages long-term client relationships and a reputation for partnership and quality service. Their presence in qualified supplier registries and public contract registries enhances credibility. Growth indicators include diversified client portfolio and active engagement in multiple sectors. The company maintains a moderate digital footprint with social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn, supporting marketing and client engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some privacy awareness. The use of third-party analytics and tag management tools introduces potential privacy risks if not properly configured. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response transparency.
  4. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve compliance to enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Review and optimize third-party scripts and analytics configurations to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BluePool s.r.o.
Registration number
24122165
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BluePool s.r.o.
Description
IT consulting company providing IT professionals and teams primarily to banks, insurance companies, and telecommunications firms. They offer services including analysis, development, testing, project management, and long-term application support. They emphasize partnership, professional growth, and human approach.
Key services
IT consulting, Testing and test coordination, Software development, Project management, Application support and development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome 5.15.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Swiper slider, WOW.js animation, Google Charts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with explicit user choice.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent with business identity.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  7. Business references and client logos add trust and credibility.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom HTML/PHP platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. FontAwesome provides iconography, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site loads moderate external resources and uses a swiper slider for references. Hosting is likely provided by WEDOS, consistent with the registrar data. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of a CMS suggests manual content management, which may impact scalability. Technical risks include lack of security headers and potential outdated libraries if not regularly updated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blue-pool.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blue-pool.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.